Key result
The CACHS-Italian version demonstrated adequate validity and excellent reliability, though it showed significant nonuniform differential item functioning based on caregivers' biological sex.
Why the study?
The 20-item CACHS instrument was validated in Canada, but psychometric testing of a translated version had not been assessed in a European sample.
Observational (n=277)
Yes
The Italian version of the CACHS instrument is a valid and reliable tool for assessing caregiver contribution to heart failure self-care, though item functioning differs by caregiver sex.
Supports CACHS-Italian for HF caregiver assessment; extends Canadian validation but flags sex-based DIF requiring further study.
The 20-item Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care (CACHS) was developed and tested in a series of preliminary studies providing evidence for the validity of this instrument in Canada. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial psychometric testing of a translated version of the 20-item CACHS in a European sample using classical test theory and item response theory (IRT) methods. This study is a preplanned subanalysis of data from a multisite, descriptive study of caregivers (n = 277; mean age, 52.7 years; 70.4% female) of Italian patients with heart failure. The CACHS-Italian version demonstrated adequate validity and reliability using classical test theory methods. Using IRT methods, test information function was unimodal with more item information in the negative versus positive regions of the latent trait. Most items displayed moderate to high discrimination with acceptable levels of difficulty. Differential item functioning, which determines whether caregivers from different groups with equal amounts of the latent trait have different expected item responses, differed based on caregivers' biological sex as did the IRT discrimination "α" and difficulty "β" parameters. Overall, the CACHS-Italian version demonstrated similar psychometric properties and excellent reliability as demonstrated in the Canadian sample. However, unlike the original Canadian English version, the CACHS-Italian version showed significant nonuniform differential item functioning, discrimination, and difficulty based on caregivers' biological sex. Ongoing examination of the CACHS-Italian version, particularly in men, is needed as is further linguistic validation using the Canadian CACHS-English version in non-North American English-speaking countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Caregivers of patients with heart failure (n=277). CACHS-Italian version was evaluated on Psychometric properties (validity and reliability) using classical test theory and item response theory. The CACHS-Italian version demonstrated adequate validity and excellent reliability, though it showed significant nonuniform differential item functioning based on caregivers' biological sex.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: