Key result
Psychometric testing yields a 20-item CACHS instrument with excellent reliability and high discrimination.
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
No
The 20-item CACHS instrument demonstrates excellent reliability and appropriate item difficulty for quantifying caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care.
May allow quantification of caregiver HF self-care contributions; leaves open outcome associations and cost analyses pending further validation.
Caregivers (CGs) contribute important assistance with heart failure (HF) self-care, including daily maintenance, symptom monitoring, and management. Until CGs' contributions to self-care can be quantified, it is impossible to characterize it, account for its impact on patient outcomes, or perform meaningful cost analyses. The purpose of this study was to conduct psychometric testing and item reduction on the recently developed 34-item Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care (CACHS) instrument using classical and item response theory methods. Fifty CGs (mean age 63 years ±12.84; 70% female) recruited from a HF clinic completed the CACHS in 2014 and results evaluated using classical test theory and item response theory. Items would be deleted for low (<.05) or high (>.95) endorsement, low (<.3) or high (>.7) corrected item-total correlations, significant pairwise correlation coefficients, floor or ceiling effects, relatively low latent trait and item information function levels (<1.5 and p > .5), and differential item functioning. After analysis, 14 items were excluded, resulting in a 20-item instrument (self-care maintenance eight items; monitoring seven items; and management five items). Most items demonstrated moderate to high discrimination (median 2.13, minimum .77, maximum 5.05), and appropriate item difficulty (-2.7 to 1.4). Internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach α = .94, average inter-item correlation = .41) with no ceiling effects. The newly developed 20-item version of the CACHS is supported by rigorous instrument development and represents a novel instrument to measure CGs' contribution to HF self-care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buck et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (caregivers) (n=50). Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care (CACHS) instrument was evaluated on Psychometric properties (item reduction, discrimination, difficulty, internal consistency). Psychometric testing of the CACHS instrument yielded a 20-item version with excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α = 0.94) and moderate to high discrimination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: