Key result
OX-Et pericardium improves biocompatibility, endothelialization, anti-coagulant and anti-calcification profiles vs glutaraldehyde.
Why the study?
Glutaraldehyde-treated bioprosthetic heart valves have drawbacks including poor biocompatibility, calcification, coagulation, and difficulty with endothelialization that urgently need to be solved.
Does OX-Et crosslinking improve biocompatibility, endothelialization, anti-coagulation, and anti-calcification properties of porcine pericardium compared to glutaraldehyde crosslinking?
Does OX-Et crosslinking improve biocompatibility, endothelialization, anti-coagulation, and anti-calcification properties of porcine pericardium compared to glutaraldehyde crosslinking?
A novel non-glutaraldehyde crosslinking method using OX-Et improves the biocompatibility, endothelialization, and anti-calcification properties of porcine pericardium for bioprosthetic heart valves in preclinical models.
May support preclinical development of bioprosthetic valves; hypothesis-generating and leaves open clinical translation.
Valvular heart disease is an important disease that endangers human health and heart valve replacement has become one of the main treatments for patients with severe valvular heart disease. However, the traditional surgical valve replacement (SVR) suffers several drawbacks such as high risk, great trauma and long recovery time, and more than 30% of patients are intolerant to SVR, especially elderly patients. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive technology, transcatheter heart valve replacement (THVR) as a method of implantation without thoracotomy has become an optimal treatment for severe valvular heart disease due to its advantages of minimal trauma, low risk and fast recovery. Meanwhile, the usage of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) has been enlarged greatly with the rapid development of THVR and the aging population. Most BHVs in clinics are crosslinked by glutaraldehyde (Glut), which shows great mechanical properties and chemical stability. However, some problems such as poor biocompatibility, calcification, coagulation and endothelialization difficulty also need to be solved urgently for Glut-treated BHVs. In this work, a non-Glut treated BHV from 7a-ethyltetrahydro-oxazolo[3,4-c]oxazole (OX-Et) crosslinked porcine pericardium (PP) has been developed. Compared with glutaraldehyde-crosslinked porcine pericardium (Glut-PP), good physical and chemical properties similar to Glut-PP are shown for OX-Et treated porcine pericardium (OX-Et-PP). It is noteworthy that better biocompatibility, endothelialization performance, and anti-coagulant effect as well as the improved anti-calcification property can also be observed for OX-Et-PP in the in vitro and in vivo study, potentially making OX-Et-PP a good candidate in the application of BHVs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2021) studied Valvular heart disease. OX-Et crosslinked porcine pericardium (OX-Et-PP) vs. Glutaraldehyde-crosslinked porcine pericardium (Glut-PP) was evaluated on Biocompatibility, endothelialization performance, anti-coagulant effect, and anti-calcification property. OX-Et crosslinked porcine pericardium demonstrated better biocompatibility, endothelialization, anti-coagulant effect, and anti-calcification properties compared to glutaraldehyde-crosslinked tissue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: