Key result
Radical polymerization crosslinked porcine aortic valves exhibited better cytocompatibility, endothelialization potential, anticalcification potential, and reduced immune response than GLUT-treated valves.
Why the study?
Glutaraldehyde-treated bioprosthetic heart valves are prone to calcification and structural degradation, limiting their durability to 12-15 years.
Does radical polymerization crosslinking improve cytocompatibility and reduce calcification compared to glutaraldehyde treatment in porcine aortic valves?
Does radical polymerization crosslinking improve cytocompatibility and reduce calcification compared to glutaraldehyde treatment in porcine aortic valves?
Radical polymerization crosslinking of porcine aortic valves offers a promising non-glutaraldehyde alternative for bioprosthetic heart valves with improved cytocompatibility and reduced calcification in preclinical models.
Radical polymerization crosslinking merits further development as a GLUT alternative; leaves open clinical translation in bioprosthetic valves.
Over one million artificial heart valve transplantations are performed each year due to valvular stenosis or regurgitation. Among them, bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) are increasingly being used because of the absence of the need for lifelong anticoagulation. Almost all of the commercial BHVs are treated with Glutaraldehyde (GLUT). As GLUT-treated BHVs are prone to calcification and structural degradation, their durability is greatly reduced with a service life of only 12-15 years. The physiological structure and mechanical properties of the porcine aortic valve (PAV) are closer to that of a human heart valve, so in this study, PAV is used as the model to explore the comprehensive properties of the prepared BHVs by radical polymerization crosslinking method. We found that PAV treated by radical polymerization crosslinking method showed similar ECM stability and biaxial mechanical properties with GLUT-treated PAV. However, radical polymerization crosslinked PAV exhibited better cytocompatibility and endothelialization potential in vitro cell experiment as better anticalcification potential and reduced immune response than GLUT-treated PAV through subcutaneous animal experiments in rats. To conclude, a novel crosslinking method of non-glutaraldehyde fixation of xenogeneic tissues for the preparation of BHVs is expected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2021) studied Valvular stenosis or regurgitation. Radical polymerization crosslinking method vs. Glutaraldehyde (GLUT) treatment was evaluated on ECM stability, mechanical properties, cytocompatibility, endothelialization, anticalcification, and immune response. Radical polymerization crosslinked porcine aortic valves exhibited better cytocompatibility, endothelialization potential, anticalcification potential, and reduced immune response than GLUT-treated valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: