Key result
PV-to-atrial dominant frequency gradient <0.5 Hz predicts AF inducibility after PVI with ~91% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Can dominant frequency analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms predict paroxysmal AF maintained by non-pulmonary vein sources after PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Observational (n=61)
Can dominant frequency analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms predict paroxysmal AF maintained by non-pulmonary vein sources after PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF?
A PV-to-atrial dominant frequency gradient of <0.5 Hz accurately predicts paroxysmal AF maintained by non-PV sources that remains inducible after pulmonary vein isolation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May flag non-PV AF sources after PVI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Increasing evidence suggests that high-frequency excitation in the pulmonary vein (PV) plays a dominant role in the maintenance of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in a certain population of patients, AF remains inducible after PV isolation (PVI). We sought to clarify whether dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms can predict paroxysmal AF maintained by non-PV sources. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with paroxysmal AF (aged 59 +/- 12 years) were studied. Before PVI, bipolar electrograms during AF were recorded simultaneously from three PV ostia, the coronary sinus (CS), and the septum and free wall of the right atrium (RA). DF was obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis. AF was rendered noninducible after PVI in 39 of the 61 patients (noninducible group), but was still inducible in the remaining 22 (inducible group). Among the six recording sites, the highest DF was documented in the PV in all of the patients in the noninducible group; the maximum DF among the three PVs (PV-DF(max)) was higher than that among the CS and two RA sites (atrial DF(max); 7.2 +/- 1.0 Hz vs 5.8 +/- 0.7 Hz, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the highest DF was documented in the CS or RA in 45.5% of the patients in the inducible group; PV-DF(max) was comparable with atrial DF(max) (6.6 +/- 0.8 Hz vs 6.6 +/- 0.6 Hz). AF inducibility after PVI was predicted by a PV-to-atrial DF(max) gradient of <0.5 Hz, with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 89.7%. CONCLUSION: Paroxysmal AF maintained by non-PV sources can be predicted by the PV-to-atrial DF gradient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yokoyama et al. (2008) conducted an observational in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=61). PV-to-atrial dominant frequency gradient <0.5 Hz was evaluated on AF inducibility after pulmonary vein isolation (Sensitivity 90.9%, Specificity 89.7%). A pulmonary vein-to-atrial dominant frequency gradient of <0.5 Hz predicted atrial fibrillation inducibility after pulmonary vein isolation with 90.9% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: