Key result
Ischemic preconditioning cuts VF ~83% during ischemia and lowers reperfusion VF in dogs.
Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia and reperfusion in a canine retrograde blood flow model?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia and reperfusion in a canine retrograde blood flow model?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 35%
p-value: p=<0.05
Ischemic preconditioning reduces ventricular arrhythmias during severe ischemia and reperfusion by improving subepicardial myocardial blood flow and conduction in a canine model.
Supports mechanistic insight in canine ischemia-reperfusion; leaves open translation of preconditioning to human arrhythmia prevention.
We examined the effects of ischemic preconditioning on ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia and reperfusion from the electrophysiologic point of view by using the retrograde blood flow (RBF) model, which causes severe ischemia. A total of 51 anesthetized dogs were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (10-min simple occlusion) consisted of 15 dogs; group 2 (10-min RBF) consisted of 20 dogs; and group 3 (10-min RBF with preconditioning) consisted of 16 dogs. Preconditioning consisted of 5 cycles of 2 min of ischemia (RBF) and 5 min of reperfusion. In the subepicardium, myocardial blood flow (MBF) in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 or group 3 [group 2 (4.7 +/- 2.3 ml/min per 100 g) vs group 1 (35.0 +/- 5.8) or group 3 (22.0 +/- 4.6); p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively]. However, there were no differences in MBF in the subendocardium between the 3 groups. The incidence of conduction block in the subepicardium was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 or group 3 [group 2 (85%) vs group 1 (33%), p < 0.01; vs group 3 (38%), p < 0.01]. There were no differences in the incidence of conduction block in the subendocardium between the 3 groups. During 10-min ischemia, the incidences of ventricular fibrillation (VF) were 7% in group 1, 35% in group 2, and 6% in group 3 (group 2 vs group 1, p < 0.05; and group 2 vs group 3, p < 0.05). During 10-min reperfusion, the incidences of VF were 29% in group 1, 77% in group 2, and 33% in group 3 (group 2 vs group 1, p < 0.05; and group 2 vs group 3, p < 0.05). Ventricular arrhythmias were reduced during both 10-min ischemia and 10-min reperfusion as a result of the improvement in the conduction components by ischemic preconditioning which increased MBF in the subepicardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oka et al. (1997) studied Ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia and reperfusion (n=51). Ischemic preconditioning vs. 10-min retrograde blood flow without preconditioning was evaluated on Incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during 10-min ischemia (p=<0.05). Ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced the incidence of ventricular fibrillation during 10-minute ischemia (6% vs 35%, p<0.05) and reperfusion (33% vs 77%, p<0.05) in dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: