Key result
Complicated pregnancy history linked to ~134% higher diabetes prevalence and worse systolic ventricular performance.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate echocardiographic aspects in women with a history of preeclampsia or preeclampsia-related complications in previous pregnancies.
Does a history of complicated pregnancy affect long-term echocardiographic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in women?
Observational (n=545)
Does a history of complicated pregnancy affect long-term echocardiographic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in women?
Odds Ratio: 2.34 (95% CI 1.0323–5.3148)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.9% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=0.04
A history of preeclampsia or complicated pregnancy is associated with long-term subclinical structural and functional cardiac modifications and an increased prevalence of diabetes and rheumatic diseases.
Supports hypothesis of elevated cardiometabolic risk after complicated pregnancy; does not yet justify practice changes.
Aim To evaluated echocardiographic aspects in women with history of preeclampsia or preeclampsia-related complications in their previous pregnancies. Materials and methods Consecutive women receiving echocardiography during daily clinical echolab activity were studied using complete echocardiographic examination data and anamnestic data collection of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and rheumatic diseases. Studied women should have at least one pregnancy in more than the 10 past years, and were subdivided into two groups according to the history of complicated or physiological pregnancy. Complicated pregnancies were defined by preeclampsia or preeclampsia-related complication, such as preterm delivery or small-for-gestational age newborn. Echocardiographic parameters and prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and rheumatic disease were compared between the two groups of studied women. Results From March 2016 to May 2020, 545 women were studied, of whom 218 had a history of complicated pregnancy (mean age 60.81 ± 11.109 years vs. 62.78 ± 9.758 years of not complicated pregnancy; P = 0.03). Compared with physiological pregnancy women, complicated pregnancy ones were shorter (159.97 ± 6.608 vs. 161.42 ± 6.427 cm; P = 0.012) with lower body surface area (1.678 ± 0.1937 vs. 1.715 ± 0.1662 m 2 ; P = 0.02), had higher prevalence of diabetes (6.9 vs. 3.1%; P = 0.04; odds ratio = 2.34; CI 1.0323--5.3148) and rheumatic diseases (33 vs. 22.3%; P = 0.006; odds ratio = 1.72; CI 1.1688--2.5191), and showed a slight, not significant higher prevalence of hypertension. As for echocardiographic parameters, they showed significantly higher values of end-diastolic left ventricular posterior wall (LPWd) ( P = 0.034), a trend toward a more concentric geometry, and a worse longitudinal systolic left and right ventricle performance, represented by lower tissue Doppler systolic waves (septal: 7.41 ± 1.255 vs. 7.69 ± 1.376 cm/s; P = 0.018; and tricuspidalic: 12.64 ± 2.377 vs. 13.32 ± 2.548 cm/s; P = 0.003). Conclusion Patients with previous preeclampsia present an increased risk of hypertension, diabetes, and rheumatic diseases, suggesting that these women could share a specific predisposition to a high-risk profile. Furthermore, they show a higher prevalence of classically considered echocardiographic hypertensive-derived cardiac damage, suggesting structural and functional left ventricular modifications as subclinical aspects of long-term worse cardiovascular prognosis for these women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolini et al. (2021) conducted an observational in History of preeclampsia or preeclampsia-related complications (n=545). History of complicated pregnancy (preeclampsia or related complications) vs. History of physiological pregnancy was evaluated on Prevalence of diabetes (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.0323-5.3148, p=0.04). A history of complicated pregnancy was associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes (6.9% vs 3.1%; OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.03-5.31; P=0.04) and worse longitudinal systolic ventricular performance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: