Key result
COPD linked to ~40% higher in-hospital MACE risk in PCI patients.
Why the study?
Does the presence of COPD increase the risk of MACE and mortality in patients undergoing PCI?
Meta-Analysis (n=72,969)
Does the presence of COPD increase the risk of MACE and mortality in patients undergoing PCI?
Odds Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.19–1.65)
p-value: p=0.0001
COPD is a significant risk factor for both in-hospital and long-term adverse clinical outcomes, including MACE and mortality, following percutaneous coronary intervention.
May warrant incorporating COPD status into PCI risk stratification; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
We aimed to systematically compare Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) and mortality following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with and without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD) through a meta-analysis. Electronic databases (Cochrane library, EMBASE and Medline/PubMed) were searched for English publications comparing in-hospital and long-term MACEs and mortality following PCI in patients with a past medical history of COPD. Statistical analysis was carried out by Revman 5.3 whereby Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were considered the relevant parameters. A total number of 72,969 patients were included (7518 patients with COPD and 65,451 patients without COPD). Results of this analysis showed that in-hospital MACEs were significantly higher in the COPD group with OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.65; P = 0.0001, I 2 = 0%. Long-term MACEs were still significantly higher in the COPD group with OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.38–1.81; P = 0.00001, I 2 = 29%. Similarly, in-hospital and long-term mortality were significantly higher in patients with COPD, with OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.78–2.85; P = 0.00001, I 2 = 0% and OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.33–3.71; P = 0.002, I 2 = 97% respectively. However, the result for the long-term death was highly heterogeneous. Since in-hospital and long-term MACEs and mortality were significantly higher following PCI in patients with versus without COPD, COPD should be considered a risk factor for the development of adverse clinical outcomes following PCI. However, the result for the long-term mortality was highly heterogeneous warranting further analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bundhun et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=72,969). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) vs. Patients without COPD was evaluated on In-hospital Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19-1.65, p=0.0001). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events compared to those without COPD (OR 1.40).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: