Multicenter cohort study demonstrates deep learning prediction of gene rearrangements in large B-cell lymphoma, indicating potential to prioritize confirmatory molecular testing.
Large B-cell lymphomas are molecularly heterogeneous mature B-cell neoplasms in which assessment of MYC , BCL2 , and BCL6 rearrangement status contributes to integrated diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment planning. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the standard method for detecting these rearrangements but can be time-consuming, tissue-consuming, and resource-intensive. Here, we present HE2FISH, a weakly supervised deep-learning framework for slide-level prediction of FISH-defined MYC , BCL2 , and BCL6 rearrangement status from routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images of cases diagnosed in routine practice as large B-cell lymphoma and showing a diffuse growth pattern. Across a multicenter cohort of 1377 patients from five hospitals with paired H&E and FISH data, HE2FISH demonstrated robust cross-center generalization, achieving a mean external area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.81 for single-gene prediction, and also showed evaluable performance for FISH-defined co-rearrangement patterns. In the CHCAMS cohort with survival follow-up, HE2FISH-predicted rearrangement status stratified overall and disease-free survival comparably to FISH. Attention-based analyses provided visual summaries of high-attention image regions associated with model predictions, and incorporation of 13 structured clinicopathological variables improved performance in selected settings, particularly for co-rearrangement prediction. By generating rearrangement-probability estimates from routine H&E-stained slides without additional tissue use at the prediction stage, HE2FISH provides an H&E-based prescreening approach that may support prioritization for confirmatory molecular testing within integrated diagnostic workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: