Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 20, 2011Congestive Heart FailureOpen Access

Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration vs Conventional Diuretic Therapy in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Ultrafiltration fails to reduce time to PCWP ≤18 mm Hg versus conventional diuretics in advanced HF.

  • P=.08
  • n=36

Why the study?

Concerns exist regarding the safety and efficacy of ultrafiltration compared with conventional diuretic therapy in patients with advanced decompensated heart failure.

Does extracorporeal ultrafiltration reduce the time required to normalize pulmonary capillary wedge pressure compared to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with advanced decompensated heart failure?

Comparison

Extracorporeal ultrafiltration vs conventional diuretic therapy at admission

Design

Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial

Authors

MHMazen HannaHeart Failure & Transplant
W.H. Wilson Tang
W.H. Wilson TangHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
BTBoon Wee TeoCleveland Clinic

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Ultrafiltration does not hasten PCWP normalization; challenges its use for rapid decongestion targets in advanced HF and leaves secondary benefits for further trials.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=36)

Randomization

randomized

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does extracorporeal ultrafiltration reduce the time required to normalize pulmonary capillary wedge pressure compared to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with advanced decompensated heart failure?

P
Population
36 patients with advanced heart failure admitted to an intensive care unit for hemodynamically guided therapy.
I
Intervention
Extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF) at admission
C
Comparator
Conventional diuretic (CD) therapy at admission
O
Outcome
Time required for pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to be maintained at a value of ≤18 mm Hg for at least 4 consecutive hourssurrogate

Main Result

p-value: p=.08

In patients with advanced decompensated heart failure, ultrafiltration safely achieves greater volume removal and shorter hospital stay compared to conventional diuretics, despite not significantly reducing the time to normalize PCWP.

Cite This Study

Hanna et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure (n=36). Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration vs. Conventional diuretic therapy was evaluated on Time required for pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to be maintained at a value of ≤18 mm Hg for at least 4 consecutive hours (p=.08). Extracorporeal ultrafiltration did not significantly reduce the time to achieve a PCWP ≤18 mm Hg compared to conventional diuretic therapy in advanced heart failure (P=0.08).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa80998eb815e3469da126fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00231.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Acute Vasoconstrictor Response to Intravenous Furosemide in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure1985 · 583 citations
  2. 2Vasopressin V 2 -Receptor Blockade With Tolvaptan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure2003 · 430 citations
  3. 3Intravenous Nesiritide, a Natriuretic Peptide, in the Treatment of Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure2000 · 912 citations
  4. 4Ultrafiltration Versus Usual Care for Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure2005 · 420 citations
  5. 5Diseases of the Heart and Blood Vessels: Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis1964 · 298 citations