Key result
Monopolar surgical equipment induces pacemaker EMI above 7W in phantom models while bipolar causes none.
Why the study?
Does the Finite Element Method accurately estimate electromagnetic interference on pacemakers caused by high frequency surgical equipment?
Does the Finite Element Method accurately estimate electromagnetic interference on pacemakers caused by high frequency surgical equipment?
The Finite Element Method is a feasible and useful tool for investigating electromagnetic interference on pacemakers caused by conductive currents from high-frequency surgical equipment.
High frequency surgical equipments have been reported to exert electromagnetic interference on implanted cardiac pacemakers because of the conductive currents. We proposed a methodology to evaluate the electromagnetic interference possible to simulate the complex anatomy using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and examined its feasibility. We performed an inhibition test and an asynchronous test using a phantom as the standardized Irnich human body model. We injected 10W of electrical energy (515 kHz, 270mARMS) using a high frequency surgical equipment, and measured the potential at 18 measuring electrodes placed in the phantom and the voltage between the electrodes of the pacemaker. A three-dimensional FEM model of phantom had been developed using 193 slices of X-ray CT images taken in 2mm pitch. Electrical potentials at each electrode were estimated using the FEM model and compared with experimental results. If output of the high frequency surgical equipment became more than 7W, the asynchronous test was positive. The maximum error was 25% between measured voltages and estimated voltages using FEM analysis, and average error was 13%. Those results demonstrate that the FEM analysis method is useful to investigate the electromagnetic interference on pacemakers by conductive currents, determining the presence or absence of electromagnetic interference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2014) studied Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardiac pacemakers. High frequency surgical equipment (monopolar vs bipolar) vs. Bipolar vs Monopolar / FEM vs measured was evaluated on Voltage between pacemaker electrodes and presence of electromagnetic interference (asynchronous pacing). Monopolar high-frequency surgical equipment induced electromagnetic interference in a pacemaker phantom model at outputs above 7W, whereas bipolar equipment caused no interference, with FEM analysis estimating voltages with an average error of 13%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: