Key result
Interval-walk training in hypoxia fails to improve body mass, BP, or functional performance versus normoxia.
Why the study?
The study compared the effects of short-term, perceptually regulated interval-walking training in hypoxia versus normoxia on health outcomes in overweight-to-obese individuals.
Does perceptually regulated interval-walk training in hypoxia improve cardiometabolic risk factors and exercise tolerance in overweight-to-obese adults compared to normoxia?
RCT (n=16)
Single-blind
Simple randomization
No
Does perceptually regulated interval-walk training in hypoxia improve cardiometabolic risk factors and exercise tolerance in overweight-to-obese adults compared to normoxia?
Absolute Event Rate: 91.7% vs 95.5%
p-value: p=0.55
A 2-week perceptually regulated interval-walk training program in hypoxia does not improve cardiometabolic risk factors or exercise tolerance compared to normoxia in overweight-to-obese adults.
No support for short-term hypoxic interval walking in overweight adults; leaves open longer protocols or different populations.
We compared the effects of short-term, perceptually regulated training using interval-walking in hypoxia vs. normoxia on health outcomes in overweight-to-obese individuals. Sixteen adults (body mass index = 33 ± 3 kg·m-2) completed eight interval-walk training sessions (15 × 2 min walking at a rating of perceived exertion of 14 on the 6-20 Borg scale; rest = 2 min) either in hypoxia (FiO2 = 13.0%) or normoxia during two weeks. Treadmill velocity did not differ between conditions or over time (p > 0.05). Heart rate was higher in hypoxia (+10 ± 3%; p = 0.04) during the first session and this was consistent within condition across the training sessions (p > 0.05). Similarly, arterial oxygen saturation was lower in hypoxia than normoxia (83 ± 1% vs. 96 ± 1%, p < 0.05), and did not vary over time (p > 0.05). After training, perceived mood state (+11.8 ± 2.7%, p = 0.06) and exercise self-efficacy (+10.6 ± 4.1%, p = 0.03) improved in both groups. Body mass (p = 0.55), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.19 and 0.07, respectively) and distance covered during a 6-min walk test (p = 0.11) did not change from pre- to post-tests. Short term (2-week) perceptually regulated interval-walk training sessions with or without hypoxia had no effect on exercise-related sensations, health markers and functional performance. This mode and duration of hypoxic conditioning does not appear to modify the measured cardiometabolic risk factors or improve exercise tolerance in overweight-to-obese individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hobbins et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Overweight and obesity (n=16). Interval-walk training in hypoxia vs. Interval-walk training in normoxia was evaluated on Body mass (p=0.55). Short-term perceptually regulated interval-walk training in hypoxia did not significantly improve body mass, blood pressure, or functional performance compared to normoxia in overweight-to-obese adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: