Key result
DDDR pacemakers mimic tracking above 100 ppm through normal P wave inhibition of sensor-driven atrial output.
Why the study?
Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers exhibit unexpected upper rate behaviors related to P wave tracking above the maximum tracking rate that require clarification.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Apparent P wave tracking above the maximum tracking rate in DDDR pacemakers is a normal function caused by P waves inhibiting sensor-driven atrial output, and should not be mistaken for malfunction.
Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemakers have recently become available. These devices, whose rate response is determined by the combined input from the intrinsic atrial rate and the sensor-driven rate, have led to some unexpected upper rate behaviors. In the case presented, with the maximum sensor pacing rate at 150 ppm, multiple episodes of apparent P wave tracking occurred above the maximum P wave tracking rate of 100 ppm. This behavior is explained by P waves that inhibit sensor-driven atrial output; inhibition may result in variable maximum tracking rates that are equal to the current sensor-driven rate. This effect appears to have minimal physiological consequence. Its importance lies in its recognition as normal DDDR function so that searches for pacemaker malfunction will not be made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higano et al. (1989) conducted a case report in Patients with DDDR pacemakers (n=1). DDDR pacemaker was evaluated on Apparent P wave tracking above the maximum P wave tracking rate. In a patient with a DDDR pacemaker, apparent P wave tracking occurred above the maximum tracking rate of 100 ppm due to P waves inhibiting sensor-driven atrial output, representing normal function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: