Key result
Occlutech Figulla Flex II proves noninferior to Amplatzer Septal Occluder with ~94% uncomplicated closure success.
Why the study?
Does the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder improve successful device placement and defect closure without major complications compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder in patients > 8kg undergoing transcatheter ASD closure?
RCT (n=176)
2:1
Yes
Does the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder improve successful device placement and defect closure without major complications compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder in patients > 8kg undergoing transcatheter ASD closure?
The Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder is non-inferior and potentially more efficacious with fewer complications than the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for transcatheter ASD closure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OFFII noninferior to ASO for ASD closure with fewer complications and higher early success; provides first randomized device comparison.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder (OFFII) with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) in patients > 8kg undergoing transcatheter ASD closure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized, controlled, multi-center prospective clinical trial with randomization 2:1 in favor of the OFFII. Primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of successful device placement and defect closure without major complications at hospital discharge. All data were assessed through a core laboratory. Interim analysis was performed when 70% of the patients were treated to evaluate for noninferiority. From a total of 176 randomized subjects, interim analysis was performed on the first 158 patients (65.2% female) (107 OFFII/51 ASO) undergoing device closure at a median weight of 42 kg (range 13-125 kg). Seventy-six percent (120 patients) completed 6-month follow-up. Successful device placement (first attempt) was achieved in 99.1% of the OFF group vs 90.2% of the ASO group (P < 0.05). Early efficacy success was achieved in 94.4% of the OFFII group vs 90.2% of the ASO group (P < 0.001). The incidence of major complications was 5.6% for the OFFII group compared to 9.8% for the ASO. CONCLUSIONS: The OFFII device was not inferior to the ASO with less complications and greater efficacy than the ASO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenny et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in secundum atrial septal defects (n=176). Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder vs. Amplatzer Septal Occluder was evaluated on rate of successful device placement and defect closure without major complications at hospital discharge (p=<0.001). The Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder was noninferior to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for successful device placement and defect closure without major complications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: