Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 7, 2026Blood Pressure Monitoring

Validation of the Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P in adolescents and adults according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd 2:2024) standard

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Automatic blood pressure monitor DBP-62F4B-P meets accuracy standards versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.

  • MD -0.49 mmHg for SBP and 1.45 mmHg for DBP
  • n=90

Why the study?

To validate the accuracy and safety of the DBP-62F4B-P automatic blood pressure monitor in adolescents and adults according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard.

Does the Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P accurately measure blood pressure compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer in adolescents and adults?

Population

90 adolescents and adults with arm circumference 22.0-42.0 cm

Comparison

DBP-62F4B-P monitor vs mercury sphygmomanometer

Design

Validation study according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard

Authors

XGXiaojing GuoShanghai Normal University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports device accuracy in tested cohort; leaves open broader validation before routine adoption.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=90)

Structured PICO

Does the Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P accurately measure blood pressure compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer in adolescents and adults?

P
Population
90 adolescents and adults with arm circumference 22.0-42.0 cm undergoing blood pressure monitor validation.
E
Exposure
Blood pressure measurement using Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor (model: DBP-62F4B-P)
C
Comparator
Blood pressure measurement using mercury sphygmomanometer (reference device)
O
Outcome
Mean difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between test device and reference device according to AAMI/ESH/ISO standardssurrogate

Main Result

Mean Difference: -0.49

The Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P meets international accuracy standards for blood pressure measurement in adolescents and adults.

Cite This Study

Xiaojing Guo (2026) reported a cross-sectional. Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P vs. Mercury sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Mean difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.49 mmHg for SBP and 1.45 mmHg for DBP). The Arm-Type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor DBP-62F4B-P met accuracy standards with a mean difference of -0.49 mmHg for SBP and 1.45 mmHg for DBP compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa92dca3e7032f9260dfed2https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000818
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals2005 · 4,004 citations
  2. 2A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices2018 · 468 citations
  3. 3Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension2004 · 53 citations
  4. 4Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants2016 · 2,667 citations
  5. 52021 European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for office and out-of-office blood pressure measurement2021 · 854 citations