Key result
Novel nonlinear afterload concept generates physiological pressures matching in vivo measurements in pig hearts.
Why the study?
Existing ex vivo working heart models limit practical independent control of systolic and diastolic aortic pressure to safely test donor hearts under multiple loading conditions.
A novel nonlinear afterload concept successfully replicates physiological aortic pressure waveforms in an ex vivo porcine heart model, potentially improving donor heart evaluation.
May refine ex vivo donor heart testing in preclinical models; leaves open translation to clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Existing working heart models for ex vivo functional evaluation of donor hearts often use cardiac afterloads made up of discrete resistive and compliant elements. This approach limits the practicality of independently controlling systolic and diastolic aortic pressure to safely test the heart under multiple loading conditions. We present and investigate a novel afterload concept designed to enable such control. METHODS: Six ∼70 kg pig hearts were evaluated in vivo, then ex vivo in left-ventricular working mode using the presented afterload. Both in vivo and ex vivo, the hearts were evaluated at two exertion levels: at rest and following a 20 μg adrenaline bolus, while measuring aortic pressure and flow, left ventricular pressure and volume, and left atrial pressure. RESULTS: The afterload gave aortic pressure waveforms that matched the general shape of the in vivo measurements. A wide range of physiological systolic pressures (93 to 160 mm Hg) and diastolic pressures (73 to 113 mm Hg) were generated by the afterload. CONCLUSIONS: With the presented afterload concept, multiple physiological loading conditions could be tested ex vivo, and compared with the corresponding in vivo data. An additional control loop from the set pressure limits to the measured systolic and diastolic aortic pressure is proposed to address discrepancies observed between the set limits and the measured pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pigot et al. (2022) studied Ex vivo heart evaluation (n=6). Novel nonlinear afterload concept vs. In vivo measurements was evaluated on Aortic pressure waveforms and physiological systolic/diastolic pressures. A novel nonlinear afterload concept generated a wide range of physiological systolic (93 to 160 mm Hg) and diastolic (73 to 113 mm Hg) pressures that matched in vivo measurements in pig hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: