Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 14, 2012Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Comparison of the predictive value of EuroSCORE, SYNTAX score, and clinical SYNTAX score for outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Clinical SYNTAX score outperforms standard SYNTAX score in predicting mortality after left main PCI.

  • P<0.01
  • n=198

Why the study?

Risk scoring systems for pre-PCI risk stratification in patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery disease require assessment for prognostic value.

Does the Clinical SYNTAX score provide better prognostic value than the anatomical SYNTAX score for outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery disease?

Population

198 consecutive patients with unprotected LM disease undergoing PCI

Comparison

Clinical SYNTAX score and EuroSCORE vs SYNTAX score

Design

Observational cohort study

Follow-up

1 year

Authors

YJYu‐Lan JouTaipei City HospitalTLTse‐Min LuNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityYCYing‐Hwa ChenNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May aid risk stratification in left main PCI; leaves open whether Clinical SYNTAX score should guide decisions pending validation.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=198)

Structured PICO

Does the Clinical SYNTAX score provide better prognostic value than the anatomical SYNTAX score for outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery disease?

P
Population
198 consecutive patients (mean age 71.5 years) with unprotected left main coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated for 30-day and 1-year outcomes.
E
Exposure
Clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) and EuroSCORE for risk stratification
C
Comparator
Anatomical SYNTAX score
O
Outcome
30-day and 1-year all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, nonfatal MI, and clinical-driven target vessel revascularization)composite

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.01

The Clinical SYNTAX score and EuroSCORE are independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year outcomes in patients undergoing left main PCI, with CSS showing superior discriminatory ability compared to the anatomical SYNTAX score alone.

Cite This Study

Jou et al. (2012) conducted an observational in unprotected left main coronary artery disease (n=198). Clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) vs. SYNTAX score was evaluated on 30-day and 1-year all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (p=<0.01). The Clinical SYNTAX score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for 30-day and 1-year all-cause death compared to the SYNTAX score (P<0.01) in patients undergoing left main PCI.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa9438c6db186eb9162efdahttps://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23450

Topics

Percutaneous coronary intervention
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Unprotected Left Main Stenting in the Real World2009 · 72 citations
  2. 2Nonrandomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Octogenarians2008 · 170 citations
  3. 3Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials2007 · 5,528 citations
  4. 4Risk of Assessing Mortality Risk in Elective Cardiac Operations2009 · 401 citations
  5. 5European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE)1999 · 3,398 citations