Key result
Higher Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and lower Prognostic Nutritional Index independently predict increased rehospitalization risk in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction carries high morbidity, prompting evaluation of the prognostic significance of PNI and PIV to improve diagnostic work-up and risk stratification.
Do Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) predict rehospitalization in patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=152)
Do Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) predict rehospitalization in patients with HFpEF?
PIV and PNI are significant independent predictors of 6-month rehospitalization in patients with HFpEF, outperforming BMI and SII.
May refine HFpEF rehospitalization risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a significant public health concern with high morbidity. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) in HFpEF, aiming to enhance understanding of its inflammatory and nutritional aspects and identify markers for better diagnosis and risk stratification. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 71 patients diagnosed with HFpEF using the HFA-PEFF algorithm and 81 control subjects without heart failure. The PIV, and PNI indices were calculated. A 6-month follow-up of the HFpEF group was conducted to assess rehospitalization rates. RESULTS: The study found that patients with HFpEF had significantly higher PIV and PNI rates than the control group (P=0.016, P<0.001). A negative correlation (r=-0.328, P<0.001) was observed between the PNI and HFA-PEFF scores. The ROC analysis demonstrated that PIV (AUC: 0.92) had the strongest predictive ability for rehospitalization, followed by Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII, AUC: 0.87) and PNI (AUC: 0.78), while BMI showed the weakest performance (AUC: 0.59). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that both PNI (OR: 0.783, 95% CI: 0.627-0.977, P=0.031) and PIV (OR: 1.012, 95% CI: 1.003-1.021, P=0.008) were significant predictors of rehospitalization in HFpEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: PIV and PNI are important parameters that play a predictive role in diagnosing HFpEF and independently predicting rehospitalization. In the multivariate analyses for rehospitalization, that PIV stands out more than SII, and PNI stands out more than BMI, was current and valuable information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavuz et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=152). Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) vs. Control subjects without heart failure was evaluated on Rehospitalization (OR 1.012, 95% CI 1.003-1.021, p=0.008). Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (OR 1.012; 95% CI 1.003-1.021) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (OR 0.783; 95% CI 0.627-0.977) were significant independent predictors of rehospitalization in HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: