Key result
Early intrathoracic impedance threshold crossing is linked to ~115% higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
Threshold crossings of intrathoracic impedance trends detected by implanted devices have been associated with heart failure events, but their long-term prognostic significance for mortality risk has not been demonstrated.
Does early threshold crossing of intrathoracic impedance predict increased mortality in patients with implantable devices?
Cohort (n=21,217)
Does early threshold crossing of intrathoracic impedance predict increased mortality in patients with implantable devices?
Hazard Ratio: 2.15 (95% CI 1.95–2.38)
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Early threshold crossing of intrathoracic impedance in patients with implantable devices is a strong predictor of increased long-term all-cause mortality, independent of device-detected AF or shocks.
Impedance threshold crossings may flag higher mortality risk in device patients; leaves open whether prospective monitoring alters outcomes or guides therapy.
AIMS: Threshold crossings of impedance trends detected by implanted devices have been associated with clinically relevant heart failure events, but long-term prognosis of such events has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between alterations in intrathoracic impedance and mortality risk in patients with implantable devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed remote monitoring data in the de-identified Medtronic CareLink(®) Discovery Link that captured intrathoracic impedance trends for >6 months. The initial 6 months of the cardiac and impedance trends were used as the observation period to create the patient groups and cross-referenced with the Social Security Death Index for mortality data. In our study cohort of 21 217 patients, 36% experienced impedance threshold crossing within the initial 6 months of monitoring (defined as the 'early threshold crossing' group). Patients with early threshold crossings demonstrated an increased risk of age- and gender-adjusted all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-2.38, P< 0.0001]. Increased mortality risk remained significant when analysed in subgroups of patients without defibrillator shock (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.90-2.34, P< 0.0001, n= 1621) or within those patients without device-detectable atrial fibrillation (AF) during the initial 6 months of monitoring (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.86-2.34, P< 0.0001, n= 17 235). Both the number and the duration of early threshold crossings of impedance trends detectable by implanted devices were associated with increased mortality risk. Furthermore, the improvement of altered impedance trends portends more favourable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold crossing of impedance trends detectable by implanted devices is associated with relatively increased mortality risk even after adjusted for demographic, device-detected AF, or defibrillator shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Patients with implantable devices (n=21,217). Early threshold crossing of intrathoracic impedance trends vs. No early threshold crossing was evaluated on Age- and gender-adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.95-2.38, p=< 0.0001). Early threshold crossing of intrathoracic impedance trends within the first 6 months was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.95-2.38; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: