Key result
Three or more high-risk HFRS alerts linked to ~150% greater HF hospitalization risk.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the use of CIED-generated Heart Failure Risk Score alerts within an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to heart failure management.
Cohort (n=188)
No
Hazard Ratio: 2.5 (95% CI 1.1–5.6)
p-value: p=0.03
CIED-generated HFRS alerts identify a highly co-morbid cohort with significant healthcare utilization, where multiple alerts strongly predict heart failure hospitalization, supporting an integrated multidisciplinary management approach.
Multiple high-risk alerts identify high-risk patients; leaves open whether alert-triggered interventions reduce HF hospitalizations.
Aim: To evaluate use of CIED-generated Heart Failure Risk Score (HFRS) alerts in an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to HF management. Methods: We undertook a prospective, single centre outcome study of patients implanted with an HFRS-enabled Medtronic CIED, generating a “high risk” alert between November 2018 and November 2020. All patients generating a “high risk” HFRS alert were managed within an integrated HF pathway. Alerts were shared with local HF teams, prompting patient contact and appropriate intervention. Outcome data on health care utilisation (HCU) and mortality were collected. A validated questionnaire was completed by the HF teams to obtain feedback. Results: 367 “High risk” alerts were noted in 188 patients. The mean patient age was 70 and 49% had a Charlson Comorbidity Score of >6. Mean number of alerts per patients was 1.95 and 44 (23%) of patients had >3 “high risk” alerts in the follow up period. Overall, 75 (39%) patients were hospitalised in the 4−6-week period of the alert; 53 (28%) were unplanned of which 24 (13%) were for decompensated HF. A total of 33 (18%) patients died in the study period. Having three or more alerts significantly increased the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 2.5, CI 1.1−5.6 p = 0.03). The feedback on the pathway was positive. Conclusions: Patients with “high risk” alerts are co-morbid and have significant HCU. An integrated approach can facilitate timely risk stratification and intervention. Intervention in these patients is not limited to HF alone and provides the opportunity for holistic management of this complex cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garner et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=188). ≥3 high risk HFRS alerts vs. <3 high risk HFRS alerts was evaluated on Hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.6, p=0.03). In patients with heart failure and an HFRS-enabled CIED, having three or more high-risk alerts significantly increased the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 2.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: