Key result
Concurrent CAD is not linked to higher 1-year mortality following TAVI.
Why the study?
The presence of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI may increase in-hospital and long-term mortality.
Does the presence of coronary artery disease worsen outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Cohort (n=142)
No
Does the presence of coronary artery disease worsen outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.4% vs 15.4%
p-value: p=NS
The presence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI does not significantly affect short- and mid-term outcomes despite a higher baseline risk profile.
CAD in TAVI patients may signal higher risk; leaves open whether revascularization alters outcomes in this observational series.
Introduction: The presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may increase in-hospital and long-term mortality.Aim: To evaluate the impact of CAD in patients who underwent TAVI. Material and methods:The study group consisted of the first 142 patients treated with TAVI between 26 November 2008 and 31 December 2015.The patients were divided into two groups: group I comprised 103 (72.5%) patients with CAD, and group II comprised 39 (27.5%) patients without CAD.Results: Group I was characterized by a significantly higher risk according to EuroSCORE -11.2 ±2.5 vs. 9 ±2.3 in group II (p < 0.001) and Logistic EuroSCORE -25.4 ±13.4 vs. 16.3 ±8.7 (p < 0.001).30-day mortality was 8 (7.8%) vs. 2 (5.1%) (p = NS) and 1-year mortality was 22 (21.4%) vs. 6 (15.4%) (p = NS) in group I and II respectively.The composite endpoint evaluating the efficacy of TAVI was achieved in 82 (79.6%) vs. 31 (79.5%)(p = NS) in group I and II respectively.The composite endpoint, which involved 30-day observation, occurred in 39 (37.86%) vs. 12 (30.77%)(p = NS) and the composite endpoint, which involved 1-year evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TAVI, occurred in 48 (57.8%) vs. 13 (48.1%)(p = NS) in patients with and without CAD respectively.Conclusions: The short-and mid-term outcomes of TAVI patients with CAD, despite higher risk profile, did not differ from the outcomes of treatment in patients without CAD.Key words: percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass graft, transcatheter aortic valve implantation. S u m m a r yWe decided to submit the manuscript for your consideration since it concerns a very important clinical problem.This paper may be of significant importance since, to the best of our knowledge it is the first to present data concerning coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) based on the endpoints suggested by the VARC.The incidence of CAD was found not to affect the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of treatment of patients suffering from AS using TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chodór et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=142). Coronary artery disease vs. No coronary artery disease was evaluated on 1-year mortality (p=NS). The presence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation did not significantly affect 1-year mortality (21.4% vs 15.4%, p=NS) compared to patients without coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: