Key result
High systemic immune-inflammation index linked to ~478% higher odds of severe calcific aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Inflammation plays a significant role in calcific aortic stenosis, but the predictive value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in severe calcific aortic stenosis required investigation.
Does the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predict the presence of severe calcific aortic stenosis?
Case-Control (n=641)
Does the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predict the presence of severe calcific aortic stenosis?
Odds Ratio: 5.78 (95% CI 3.93–4.89)
The systemic immune-inflammation index is significantly elevated in patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis and correlates with disease severity markers such as aortic valve area and mean transvalvular gradient.
SII may support risk stratification in calcific AS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
AIM: Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular disease especially in elderly population. Inflammation plays significant role in the pathophysiological mechanism. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a novel marker of immune system and inflammation that includes neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet cell counts. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of SII in calcific severe AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Severe calcific AS patients were categorized into two groups: High flow-high gradient (HFHG) AS (n = 289) and low flow-low gradient AS (n = 79). Control group included 273 patients with similar clinical and demographic characteristics but without AS. SII was calculated as absolute platelet count × absolute neutrophil count/absolute lymphocyte count. RESULTS: SII levels were 525 ± 188, 835 ± 402, and 784 ± 348 in control, HFHG AS, and LFLG AS groups, respectively (P < .001). Correlation analyses revealed significant and positive correlation between SII and mean aortic transvalvular pressure gradient (r = .342, P < .001), and negative and significant correlation between SII and AVA (r = -.461, P < .001). Multivariate analysis performed in separate models demonstrated sex, CAD, LDL, and SII levels (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.004, 95 CI%:1.003-1.004) as independent predictors of severe AS in Model 1. According to Model 2, sex, CAD, LDL, and high SII (>661) (OR:5.78, 95 CI%:3.93-4.89) remained as independent predictors of severe AS. CONCLUSION: SII levels can be useful to predict severe calcific AS patients and significantly correlate with AVA and mean aortic transvalvular pressure gradient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erdoğan et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Calcific severe aortic stenosis (n=641). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) vs. Low SII / Controls without aortic stenosis was evaluated on Presence of severe calcific aortic stenosis (OR 5.78, 95% CI 3.93-4.89). High systemic immune-inflammation index (>661) was an independent predictor of severe calcific aortic stenosis (OR 5.78; 95% CI 3.93-4.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: