Key result
Protocol outlines an upcoming systematic review of TAVI outcomes and quality of life in frail patients.
Why the study?
Frailty predicts poor outcomes after TAVI, but operationalisation of frailty instruments and clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in frail TAVI recipients require systematic evaluation.
How do frailty instruments operationalize frailty, and what are the clinical outcomes and changes in quality of life in frail patients undergoing TAVI?
Systematic Review
How do frailty instruments operationalize frailty, and what are the clinical outcomes and changes in quality of life in frail patients undergoing TAVI?
This protocol outlines a systematic review to evaluate the operationalization of frailty instruments and determine clinical outcomes and quality of life changes in frail patients undergoing TAVI.
Protocol for frailty-TAVI meta-analysis; will guide risk stratification and QoL assessment upon completion.
INTRODUCTION: Aortic stenosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in older patients. The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high or intermediate risk of adverse events. Existing evidence highlights the importance of frailty as a predictor of poor outcomes post-TAVI. The objective of this study is to review the operationalisation of frailty instruments for TAVI recipients and determine clinical outcomes and the change in quality of life in frail patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Methods are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist. We will search relevant databases to identify published, completed but unpublished and ongoing studies. We will include studies of patients with aortic stenosis, diagnosed as frail and who underwent a TAVI procedure that report mortality, clinical outcomes or health-related quality of life. Retrospective or prospective cohort studies, randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials will be eligible for inclusion. Two researchers will independently screen articles for inclusion, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. One researcher will extract data with audit by a second researcher. The risk of bias in studies will be evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analysis of mortality, survival curve and the change in quality of life will be performed if appropriate. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression will be performed if necessary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Due to the nature of this study, no ethical issues are foreseen. We will disseminate the results of our systematic review through a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018090597.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Aortic stenosis in frail patients. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on Mortality, clinical outcomes, and change in quality of life. This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes and changes in quality of life in frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: