Key result
Unipolar LV pacing resolves electrical storm triggered by bipolar anodic capture during CRT implantation.
Why the study?
The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial, with some reports of proarrhythmic effects of epicardial left ventricular pacing.
Does switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolve electrical storm caused by bipolar epicardial LV stimulation in a patient undergoing CRT?
Case Report (n=1)
Does switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolve electrical storm caused by bipolar epicardial LV stimulation in a patient undergoing CRT?
Anodic capture during bipolar epicardial left ventricular stimulation can cause proarrhythmic effects like electrical storm, which may be resolved by switching to unipolar pacing.
May signal proarrhythmic BiVp risk in select CRT patients; leaves open the overall effect on ventricular arrhythmias.
Background: The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial. Several studies reported a decreased risk, but some studies reported a potential proarrhythmic effect of epicardial left ventricular pacing resolved upon discontinuation of biventricular pacing (BiVp). Case Summary: A 67-year-old woman with a history of heart failure due to nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block was hospitalized for CRT device implantation. Unpredictably, as soon as the leads have been connected to the generator, an electrical storm (ES) occurred with relapsing self-resolving polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) triggered by ventricular extra beats with short-long-short sequences. The ES was resolved without interrupting BiVp switching to unipolar left ventricular (LV) pacing. This allowed to keep CRT active with extreme clinical benefit for the patient and to demonstrate that the cause of the PVT was the anodic capture of bipolar LV stimulation. Reverse electrical remodeling was also demonstrated after 3 months of effective BiVp. Discussion: Proarrhythmic effect of CRT is a rare but significant complication of CRT, and it may compel to discontinuation of the BiVp. The reversal of the physiological transmural activation sequence of epicardial LV pacing and subsequent prolonging of corrected QT interval have been speculated as the most probable explanation, but our case highlights the possibility that the anodic capture may play a relevant role in PVT genesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnano et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Heart failure due to nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (n=1). Unipolar left ventricular pacing vs. Bipolar epicardial left ventricular stimulation was evaluated on Resolution of electrical storm and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolved an electrical storm caused by anodic capture of bipolar LV stimulation during CRT implantation, allowing effective biventricular pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: