Key result
Switching to unipolar LV pacing resolves electrical storm triggered by bipolar epicardial stimulation.
Why the study?
The effect of CRT on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial, with some studies reporting a proarrhythmic effect of epicardial left ventricular pacing.
Does switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolve electrical storm caused by bipolar epicardial LV stimulation in a patient undergoing CRT implantation?
Case Report (n=1)
Does switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolve electrical storm caused by bipolar epicardial LV stimulation in a patient undergoing CRT implantation?
Switching from bipolar to unipolar left ventricular pacing can resolve electrical storm caused by anodic capture during CRT implantation, allowing for the safe continuation of biventricular pacing.
Unipolar pacing may rescue bipolar-triggered storms in CRT; single-case observation leaves generalizability open.
Background: The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial. Several studies reported a decreased risk, but some studies reported a potential proarrhythmic effect of epicardial left ventricular pacing resolved upon discontinuation of biventricular pacing (BiVp). Case Summary: A 67-years old woman with a history of heart failure due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle brunch block was hospitalized for CRT device implantation. Unpredictably, as soon as the leads have been connected to the generator, electrical storm (ES) occurred with relapsing self-resolving polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) triggered by ventricular extra beats with short-long-short sequence. The ES was resolved without interrupting BiVp switching to unipolar left ventricular (LV) pacing. This allowed to keep CRT active with extreme clinical benefit for the patient and to demonstrate that the cause of the PVT was the anodic capture of bipolar LV stimulation. Reverse electrical remodeling was also demonstrated after 3 months of effective BiVp. Discussion: Proarrhythmic effect of CRT is a rare but significant complication of CRT, and it may compel to discontinue the BiVp. The reversal of the physiological transmural activation sequence of epicardial LV pacing and subsequent prolonging of corrected QT interval have been speculated as the most probable explanation, but our case highlights the possibility that the anodic capture may play a relevant role in PVT genesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnano et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Heart failure due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (n=1). Unipolar left ventricular pacing vs. Bipolar epicardial left ventricular stimulation was evaluated on Resolution of electrical storm and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Switching to unipolar left ventricular pacing resolved an electrical storm triggered by bipolar epicardial LV stimulation, allowing continued biventricular pacing with clinical benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: