Key result
Automatic-gain ICD restores VT sensing after fixed-gain device failure despite adequate R waves.
Why the study?
Failure to sense ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation by ICDs using fixed-gain sensing is rare but clinically important to recognize and manage.
Population
A patient with second and third generation ICDs using fixed-gain sensing
Comparison
Second and third generation ICDs with fixed-gain sensing vs new device with automatic-gain sensing and epicardial leads
Design
Case report
Follow-up
Late after implantation, discovered at follow-up electrophysiology testing
Authors
Loading...
Alerts clinicians to rare fixed-gain ICD undersensing despite normal sinus sensing; leaves open optimal sensing algorithms for future devices.
Case Report (n=1)
Fixed-gain sensing ICDs may fail to sense ventricular tachycardia late after implantation, highlighting the need for follow-up electrophysiology testing and potential replacement with automatic-gain sensing devices.
Sperry et al. (1992) conducted a case report in Ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation (n=1). Fixed-gain sensing implantable cardioverter defibrillators vs. Automatic-gain sensing algorithm device was evaluated on Sensing of ventricular tachycardia. A second and third generation fixed-gain ICD failed to sense ventricular tachycardia despite adequate R wave sensing, requiring replacement with an automatic-gain sensing device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: