Key result
Transvenous lead extraction on minimally interrupted DOACs achieves ~97% success without thromboembolic events or mortality.
Why the study?
The optimal management of anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction while on DOACs remains uncertain.
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and feasible in high thromboembolic risk patients on minimally interrupted DOAC therapy?
Observational (n=84)
No
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and feasible in high thromboembolic risk patients on minimally interrupted DOAC therapy?
Transvenous lead extraction during minimally interrupted DOAC therapy appears feasible and safe in selected high-risk patients, avoiding the need for parenteral bridging.
Supports feasibility of minimally interrupted DOAC in lead extraction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have increasingly been used for several indications for systemic anticoagulation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The optimal management of anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of TLE during minimally interrupted DOAC therapy. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent TLE of a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead while on DOAC therapy. In patients deemed to be at high thromboembolic risk, the last DOAC dose was administered the morning of the day before the procedure (regardless of the type of DOAC) and was restarted as soon as possible after the procedure, without bridging with parenteral anticoagulation. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 84 patients underwent TLE while on minimally interrupted DOAC therapy (54% female, mean age: 74 ± 12 years). TLE was attempted for 161 leads, with a median lead dwell time of 61 months (interquartile range, 38-101). Complete procedural success was achieved for 156 leads (96.9%) and partial success for additional two leads (1.2%). One patient developed RV perforation and required pericardiocentesis and blood transfusion, but no surgical repair. Two patients developed pocket hematomas requiring invasive evacuation. No systemic or venous thromboembolic events were observed. There was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In selected CIED patients at high risk for thromboembolism, TLE during minimally interrupted DOAC therapy may be considered when performed at experienced centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Issa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic devices requiring transvenous lead extraction (n=84). Minimally interrupted DOAC therapy was evaluated on Complete procedural success. Transvenous lead extraction during minimally interrupted DOAC therapy achieved complete procedural success in 96.9% of leads, with no thromboembolic events or in-hospital mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Cardiac device therapyMore from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology