Key result
Intramyocardial adipose-derived regenerative cells improve MLHFQ scores by ~16 points over placebo in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Preclinical and early clinical trials suggest autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells have potential for ischemic conditions, but safety and feasibility in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy patients require assessment.
Does intramyocardial delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells improve symptoms and left ventricular function in patients with refractory chronic myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction?
RCT (n=31)
double-blind
2:1, active: placebo
Does intramyocardial delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells improve symptoms and left ventricular function in patients with refractory chronic myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction?
Absolute Event Rate: -21.6% vs -5.5%
p-value: p=0.038
Intramyocardial delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells is feasible and may improve quality of life in patients with refractory chronic myocardial ischemia, though it did not improve LV function in this small trial.
ADRCs improve quality of life without LV benefit in refractory ischemia; extends cell therapy data for symptoms but not remodeling.
OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and feasibility of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs), for treatment of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. BACKGROUND: Preclinical and early clinical trials suggest ADRCs have excellent potential for ischemic conditions. METHODS: The Athena program consisted of two parallel, prospective, randomized (2:1, active: placebo), double-blind trials assessing intramyocardial (IM) ADRC delivery [40-million, n = 28 (ATHENA) and 80-million (ATHENA II) cells, n = 3]). Patients with an EF ≥20% but ≤45%, multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) not amenable to revascularization, inducible ischemia, and symptoms of either angina (CCS II-IV) or heart failure (NYHA Class II-III) on maximal medical therapy were enrolled. All patients underwent fat harvest procedure (≤450 mL adipose), on-site cell processing (Celution® System, Cytori Therapeutics), electromechanical mapping, and IM delivery of ADRCs or placebo. RESULTS: max favored ADRCs (+45.4 ± 222 vs. -9.5 ± 137 mL/min) but there was no difference in left ventricular function or volumes. At 12-months, heart failure hospitalizations occurred in 2/17 (11.7%) [ADRC] and 3/14 (21.4%) [placebo]. Differences in NYHA and CCS classes favored ADRCs at 12-months with significant improvement in MLHFQ (-21.6 + 13.9 vs. -5.5 + 23.8, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: A small volume fat harvest, automated local processing, and IM delivery of autologous ADRCs is feasible with suggestion of benefit in "no option" CAD patients. Although the sample size is limited, the findings support feasibility and scalability for treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy with ADRCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=31). autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) vs. placebo was evaluated on Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score change (p=0.038). Intramyocardial delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells significantly improved MLHFQ scores compared to placebo (-21.6 vs -5.5, P=0.038) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: