Key result
Six-month pedometer intervention awaits trial results for improving 6MWD in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
It is unknown whether a pedometer-based walking intervention improves functional capacity and neurohumoral modulation in patients with chronic heart failure.
Does a 6-month pedometer-based walking intervention improve 6-min walk distance in physically inactive patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=400)
Single-blind
Permuted block randomization with a 1:1 ratio
Yes
Does a 6-month pedometer-based walking intervention improve 6-min walk distance in physically inactive patients with chronic heart failure?
This study protocol describes two multicenter RCTs designed to evaluate whether a 6-month pedometer-based walking intervention improves functional capacity in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity is recommended for patients with chronic heart failure to improve their functional capacity, and walking is a popular, effective, and safe form of physical activity. Pedometers have shown potential to increase the amount of walking across a range of chronic diseases, but it is unknown whether a pedometer-based intervention improves functional capacity and neurohumoral modulation in heart failure patients. METHODS: Two multicenter randomized controlled trials will be conducted in parallel: one in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the other in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Each trial will consist of a 6-month intervention with an assessment at baseline, at 3 months, at the end of the intervention, and 6 months after completing the intervention. Each trial will aim to include a total of 200 physically inactive participants with chronic heart failure who will be randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. The 6-month intervention will consist of an individualized pedometer-based walking program with weekly step goals, behavioral face-to-face sessions with a physician, and regular telephone calls with a research nurse. The intervention will be based on effective behavioral principles (goal setting, self-monitoring, personalized feedback). The primary outcome is the change in 6-min walk distance at the end of the 6-month intervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in serum biomarkers levels, pulmonary congestion assessed by ultrasound, average daily step count measured by accelerometry, anthropometric measures, symptoms of depression, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and MAGGIC risk score. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, these are the first studies to evaluate a pedometer-based walking intervention in patients with chronic heart failure with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction. The studies will contribute to a better understanding of physical activity promotion in heart failure patients to inform future physical activity recommendations and heart failure guidelines. Trial registration The trials are registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers: NCT03041610, registered 29 January 2017 (HFrEF), NCT03041376, registered 1 February 2017 (HFpEF).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Větrovský et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction (n=400). Pedometer-based walking intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to 6 months. A 6-month pedometer-based walking intervention is being evaluated for its effect on 6-minute walk distance in patients with chronic heart failure, with results pending trial completion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: