Key result
Very severe TR linked to ~143% greater risk of RHF and CV death vs moderate-to-severe TR.
Why the study?
The prognosis of patients with very severe tricuspid regurgitation defined by specific echocardiographic parameters was not well characterized.
Does a 5-grade classification identifying 'very severe' tricuspid regurgitation predict worse prognosis compared to moderate-to-severe or severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Population
259 consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe and severe tricuspid regurgitation
Comparison
Very severe TR vs severe TR vs moderate-to-severe TR
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Median 24 months (7 to 47) months
Authors
Loading...
Defining very severe TR may refine prognosis in advanced cases; leaves open whether this grading improves risk stratification or management.
Cohort (n=259)
Does a 5-grade classification identifying 'very severe' tricuspid regurgitation predict worse prognosis compared to moderate-to-severe or severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Hazard Ratio: 2.43 (95% CI 1.18–5.53)
Absolute Event Rate: 35% vs 68%
p-value: p=0.002
Identifying 'very severe' tricuspid regurgitation using specific echocardiographic parameters defines a subgroup with significantly worse clinical outcomes, supporting the use of a 5-grade classification system.
Peugnet et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=259). Very severe tricuspid regurgitation vs. Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on Combination of hospitalisation for right heart failure (RHF) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.18-5.53, p=0.002). Very severe tricuspid regurgitation was associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared to moderate-to-severe TR (adjusted HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.18-5.53; p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: