Key result
Sevoflurane with morphine shows no benefit over fentanyl in attenuating hemodynamic response to intubation.
Why the study?
Multimodal therapy can be used to obtund the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, but the comparative effects of morphine versus fentanyl with sevoflurane were unclear.
Does morphine compared to fentanyl, both with sevoflurane, improve the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
Randomised into two equal groups
Does morphine compared to fentanyl, both with sevoflurane, improve the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia?
p-value: p=0.1428
Morphine and fentanyl are equally effective in attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation when combined with sevoflurane, though morphine may result in a greater chronotropic response.
Either opioid with sevoflurane yields similar intubation hemodynamics; leaves open optimal selection in larger or higher-risk cohorts.
Background: Multimodal therapy can be used for obtundation of the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The current study was undertaken to compare the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation after administration of 0.2 mg/kg morphine or 2 μg/kg fentanyl with 2% end tidal sevoflurane during induction of anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients were randomised into two equal groups to receive either 2% end tidal sevoflurane + fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group SF) or 2% end tidal sevoflurane + morphine 0.2 mg/kg (Group SM). General anaesthesia technique was standardised for both the groups. Haemodynamic parameters heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded for 15 min. Results: The maximum increase in HR compared to baseline was statistically significant in Group SM (16.5%, P = 0.0002) which occurred at one min after tracheal intubation. The maximum increases in SBP, DBP and MAP compared to baseline occurred at one min after tracheal intubation in both the groups, Group SF (7.04%, 6.5% and 7.9% respectively) and Group SM (6.2%, 8.2% and 8.1% respectively) which was not statistically significant. The attenuation of haemodynamic response between the two groups was not statistically significant (for HR P = 0.1428, for SBP P = 0.8558, for DBP P = 0.1958 and for MAP P = 0.5303). Conclusions: With 2% end tidal sevoflurane during induction of anaesthesia, both 0.2 mg/kg morphine and 2 μg/kg fentanyl were equally effective in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. However morphine appeared to be less effective in attenuating the chronotropic response resulting in a greater increase in heart rate from baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukkara et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (n=60). Sevoflurane + fentanyl vs. 2% end tidal sevoflurane + 0.2 mg/kg morphine was evaluated on Attenuation of haemodynamic response (heart rate) (p=0.1428). Sevoflurane with fentanyl or morphine were equally effective in attenuating haemodynamic response to intubation, with no significant difference between groups for heart rate (P=0.1428).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: