Key result
Myocardial electrical impedance detects ischemic injury in dogs, increasing ~30% during the first two hours.
Why the study?
A method to simultaneously evaluate cardiac wall motion and myocardial ischemic injury by measuring myocardial electrical impedance was needed.
Does measurement of myocardial electrical impedance accurately evaluate cardiac wall motion and myocardial ischemic injury in a canine model?
Does measurement of myocardial electrical impedance accurately evaluate cardiac wall motion and myocardial ischemic injury in a canine model?
Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance can simultaneously assess cardiac wall motion and the progression of myocardial ischemic injury in a canine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable simultaneous wall motion and ischemia assessment in canine models; leaves open clinical translation.
The authors devised a new method to simultaneously evaluate cardiac wall motion and myocardial ischemic injury by measurement of myocardial electrical impedance. This method is based on the principle that electrical properties of the myocardium are affected by intra- or extracellular structure. Impedance was assessed by measuring voltage while a constant alternating current (0.4 mA, 50 kHz) was being applied to the myocardium by way of an electrode that had two parallel 6 mm long needles. In five dogs, an electrode was placed in the left ventricular wall, adjacent to a pair of ultrasonic crystals that were used to estimate regional wall thickness. To change regional contractility and to induce ischemic injury, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated. The impedance waveforms were observed to be synchronized with cardiac contraction, and changes in impedence correlated well with changes in wall thickness. Dyskinetic movements in the ischemic myocardium could also be detected through assessment of the impedance waveform. During the first 2 hr, the average value of impedance increased significantly, from 254 +/- 38 omega-cm to 329 +/- 13 omega-cm (P < 0.005), and then decreased, indicating a correlation with the progression and irreversibility of ischemic injury. This simple technique may eventually allow us to simultaneously assess cardiac wall motion and myocardial ischemia in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (1994) studied Myocardial ischemic injury (n=5). Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance was evaluated on Average value of impedance (p=< 0.005). Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance detected ischemic injury in dogs, with average impedance increasing significantly from 254 to 329 omega-cm (P < 0.005) during the first 2 hours.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: