Key result
A critical review of the evidence for fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization is warranted given its widespread use and the limitations of the invasive procedure.
Design
Editorial
Authors
Loading...
The authors argue for a critical review of the evidence supporting the widespread use of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
The authors argue for a critical review of the evidence supporting the widespread use of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
Armin Arbab‐Zadeh (2014) conducted a review in Intermediate-range coronary arterial stenoses. Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated. A critical review of the evidence for fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization is warranted given its widespread use and the limitations of the invasive procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: