Key result
Peritoneal ultrafiltration linked to a ~8% EF increase and fewer hospital days in refractory CHF.
Why the study?
Peritoneal ultrafiltration requires consideration as a therapeutic option to improve echocardiographic parameters and clinical status in refractory congestive heart failure patients.
Does peritoneal ultrafiltration improve echocardiographic parameters and clinical status in patients with refractory congestive heart failure?
Observational (n=19)
No
Does peritoneal ultrafiltration improve echocardiographic parameters and clinical status in patients with refractory congestive heart failure?
Mean Difference: 7.64
Absolute Event Rate: 43.1% vs 35.4%
p-value: p=0.008
Peritoneal ultrafiltration significantly improves echocardiographic parameters, functional capacity, and reduces hospitalizations in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.
Hypothesis-generating for peritoneal ultrafiltration in refractory HF; randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Peritoneal ultrafiltration needs consideration as a therapeutic option for improvement in echocardiographic parameters, tissue Doppler imaging, and patient clinical status in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.Methods: This prospective, non-randomised, two-year observational study from June 2012 to June 2014 included 19 clinic outpatients and in-patients admitted to the CARE hospital, Hyderabad. Baseline data was compared on initiation and after three months of ultrafiltration therapy. Out of 19 patients studied initially, 16 were alive and undergoing CAPD at 3 months.Results: 3 months post ultrafiltration, the ejection fraction (EF) improved significantly from 35.4±6.6 to 43.1±13.8 (p<0.01), right atrial volume index (RAVI) decreased significantly from 31.8±14.3 to 28.3±14.9 (P=0.016), inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter decreased significantly from 2.27±0.44 to 1.8±0.68 (P=0.01), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) decreased significantly from 50.7±14.4 mmHg to 38.1±15.6 mmHg (P<0.01), hospitalisation days decreased significantly from 17.5±8.3 to 1.7±3.4 days (P <0.0001) and the distance covered in the 6 minutes’ walk test (6MWT) increased significantly from 58.52 m±47.6 m to 176.4 m±80.7 m (p<0.0001). Except for 3 (17.6%) patients, significant patients that were NYHA class III and IV improved to NYHA class I and II (p <0.0001; Table 1).Conclusions: Ultrafiltration was safe and associated with significant improvements in echocardiographic parameters, NYHA functional class, physical performance (6MWT), and reduction of hospitalization days in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pawal et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Refractory congestive heart failure (n=19). Peritoneal ultrafiltration vs. Baseline (pre-ultrafiltration) was evaluated on Ejection Fraction (EF) (MD 7.64, p=0.008). Peritoneal ultrafiltration significantly improved ejection fraction from 35.4% to 43.1% and reduced hospitalization days in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: