Key result
Peritoneal ultrafiltration reduces myocardial depressant factors IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha in refractory CHF.
Why the study?
Ultrafiltration by peritoneal route may provide an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic heart failure who remain symptomatic despite maximal medical therapy.
Does ultrafiltration by peritoneal route improve myocardial depressant factors in patients with refractory chronic congestive cardiac failure?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does ultrafiltration by peritoneal route improve myocardial depressant factors in patients with refractory chronic congestive cardiac failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 46% vs 100%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Ultrafiltration by peritoneal route may be an effective alternative for patients with refractory chronic heart failure symptomatic despite maximal medical treatment, associated with improved myocardial depressant factors.
May support peritoneal ultrafiltration in refractory HF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Diuretics are the mainstay of treatment of refractory heart failure. There is a high incidence of dyselectrolytemia and suboptimal response due to diuretic resistance. Ultrafiltration by peritoneal route can be a safe and effective alternative. This study aims to study the ultrafiltration by peritoneal route in refractory heart failure patients with respect to change in functional status, renal parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction, number of days of hospitalization, and level of myocardial depressant factors. This was a prospective observational study conducted in Nephrology Department of tertiary care hospital. We studied patients with refractory heart failure who had persistent symptoms requiring frequent admissions despite optimal medical decongestion or had dyselectrolytemia with worsening renal parameters. The data were collected at baseline and then after 6 months of starting ultrafiltration. A total of 30 participants were studied. All the patients were in NYHA functional status Class IV before peritoneal ultrafiltration. There was a significant improvement in functional status and only 14 patients (46%) had Class III to Class IV status after application of ultrafiltration. (P < 0.001) There was a significant improvement in duration of hospital stay (75.8 ± 43.3 days to 7.8 ± 12.4, P > 0.001), serum creatinine (3.18 ± 0.98 to 2.16 ± 0.79 mg/dl, P < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction [29.3 ± 7.4 (%) to 48.5 ± 11.8 (%), P < 0.0001] post ultrafiltration. There was also significant improvement in level of myocardial depressant factors (IL-1, IL-6, TNF alpha). Ultrafiltration by peritoneal route seems to be an effective alternative and should be offered to patients with chronic heart failure who are symptomatic despite maximal medical treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedau et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Refractory chronic congestive cardiac failure (n=30). Ultrafiltration by peritoneal route vs. Baseline was evaluated on NYHA functional status Class III to IV (p=< 0.001). Peritoneal ultrafiltration in refractory heart failure significantly improved functional status, reducing the proportion of patients in NYHA Class III-IV from 100% to 46% (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: