Key result
Poor initial TIMI flow in ACS links to similar MACE but ~140% higher stent thrombosis.
Why the study?
The predictors and outcomes of poor versus good initial TIMI flow in patients with acute coronary syndrome were not fully characterized.
Does poor initial TIMI flow predict worse outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=827)
Does poor initial TIMI flow predict worse outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 15.9%
p-value: p=0.46
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, poor initial TIMI flow is associated with an increased risk of early definite stent thrombosis, although long-term MACE rates remain comparable to those with good initial flow.
Poor initial TIMI flow identifies higher-risk ACS patients; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: We explored the predictors and outcome of poor, versus good, initial TIMI flow in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN: We performed post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial of patients presenting with ACS who received 2 comparative stents. Poor initial TIMI flow was defined as baseline TIMI flow grade 0/1 at the initial coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Stent thrombosis (ST) was adjudicated according to the criteria of definite ST described by the Academic Research Consortium. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed. We report data after 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 827 patients enrolled, 279 (33.7%) had initial TIMI 0/1 flow. Median follow-up duration was 5.0 years. Presentation by ST-elevation myocardial infarction and target vessel other than left anterior descending artery predicted initial TIMI 0/1 flow. MACE rate was comparable between the 2 subgroups (14% versus 15.9%, in patients with poor versus good initial TIMI flow, respectively, p = .46). Individual endpoints were comparable (p > .05 for all). Definite ST was more frequent in patients with initial TIMI 0/1 flow (3.6% versus 1.5%, respectively, p = .048). This was driven by more frequent early events (30 days) (p = .036); late/very late events were comparable (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of poor initial TIMI flow included presentation by ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and target vessel other than left anterior descending artery. Definite ST occurred more in patients with poor, versus good, initial TIMI flow, mainly driven by difference in early events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nammas et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=827). Poor initial TIMI flow (grade 0/1) vs. Good initial TIMI flow was evaluated on major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (p=0.46). Poor initial TIMI flow in ACS patients was associated with similar MACE rates compared to good flow (14.0% vs 15.9%, p=0.46), but higher rates of definite stent thrombosis (3.6% vs 1.5%, p=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: