Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was carried out to determine the in vitro binding of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs), IQ, MeIQ, Trp-P-1, and Trp-P-2, to low molecular weight cellulose using HPLC assay and bacterial mutagenicity assay. Eight types of low molecular weight cellulose (degree of polymerization (DP): 125-180, particle size: 8-80μm, settling volume in water (SV): 3.2-6.6mL/g) were used in this study. All types of DP 180 cellulose showed higher adsorptive capacity for IQ, MeIQ, Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 than the DP 125 and DP 130.The 4 HAAs showed no significant difference in adsorption by cellulose from 10 to 80μm in particle size. In the case of 2 types of cellulose with the same DP (180) and particle size (40μm) but different SV (5.4mL/g, 4.0mL/g), Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2 and MeIQ showed no difference in adsorption but IQ was adsorbed at a higher rate (1.3 times) by the cellulose of larger SV. Highly hydrophobic compounds among the 4 HAAs (Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2) were adsorbed by cellulose in large quantities, strongly and quickly. The results of the two assays seemed to show similar patterns in the adsorption of the 4 HAAs by the 8 types of cellulose. Based on the HPLC assay, Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 were adsorbed by the 8 types of cellulose at rates of 81-95%and 71-95%. Similarly, the numbers of revertants per plate induced by Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 treated with these celluloses were 0.7-2.1% and 0.4-5.0% of the control, respectively. From these results, it has been clarified that low molecular weight cellulose with a DP about 24 to 80 times smaller than the native value can adsorb HAAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egoshi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: