Key result
Standardized dental recommendations linked to ~18% lower periodontal treatment need in severe heart disease.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether a standardized recommendation for patients with severe heart diseases to visit their dentist improves oral conditions after 12 months.
Does a standardized recommendation to visit a dentist improve oral conditions in patients with severe heart diseases?
Cohort (n=88)
No
Does a standardized recommendation to visit a dentist improve oral conditions in patients with severe heart diseases?
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 91%
p-value: p=< 0.01
A simple recommendation to visit a dentist is insufficient to ensure adequate periodontal care in patients with severe heart disease, highlighting the need for specialized interdisciplinary dental programs.
Simple dental referral yields inadequate periodontal care in HF/LVAD/HTx patients; leaves open whether structured interdisciplinary programs would improve outcomes.
Background: To assess whether the standardized recommendation of patients with heart failure (HF), left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HTx) to visit their dentist leads to improved oral conditions after 12 months. Methods: Patients from the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leipzig Heart Centre, Germany were examined at baseline and after 12 months. A dental (decayed-, missing-, and filled-teeth index (DMF-T)) and periodontal examination (periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment loss) was performed. At baseline, patients received a standardized recommendation to visit their dentist. At follow-up, a standardized questionnaire regarding the dental consultation was applied. Results: Eighty-eight participants (HTx: 31, LVAD: 43, HF: 14) were included. The majority of patients (79.5%) followed the recommendation to visit their dentist. Within the total cohort, periodontal treatment need was significantly reduced from 91% (baseline) to 75% (follow-up; p < 0.01). Only 10% of total cohort stated that they received periodontal treatment. The outcome in periodontal and dental treatment need at follow-up appointment revealed no statistically significant associations to the questionnaire regarding dentist consultation (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The simple recommendation to visit the dentist appears not enough to obtain sufficient dental and periodontal conditions in patients with severe heart diseases. Thereby, a lack in periodontal treatment of patients with HF, HTx and LVAD was identified, making interdisciplinary dental special care programs recommendable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziebolz et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Severe heart diseases (heart failure, left-ventricular assist device, heart transplantation) (n=88). Standardized recommendation to visit a dentist vs. Baseline (pre-recommendation) was evaluated on Periodontal treatment need (p=< 0.01). A standardized recommendation to visit a dentist reduced periodontal treatment need from 91% at baseline to 75% at 12 months (p < 0.01) in patients with severe heart diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: