Key result
Noninvasive peripheral venous and arm equilibrium pressures strongly correlate with invasive central venous and filling pressures.
Why the study?
Elevated central venous pressure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after the Fontan operation, and noninvasive estimation methods may improve management.
Can central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure be accurately estimated noninvasively using peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure in patients after the Fontan operation?
Observational (n=30)
Can central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure be accurately estimated noninvasively using peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure in patients after the Fontan operation?
Effect estimate: R = 0.86
p-value: p=<.0001
Peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure can noninvasively and accurately estimate central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure in patients with Fontan circulation.
May support noninvasive CVP estimation in Fontan patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Elevated central venous pressure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after the Fontan operation. The difference between mean circulatory filling pressure and central venous pressure, a driving force of venous return, is important in determining dynamic changes in central venous pressure in response to changes in ventricular properties or loading conditions. Thus, noninvasive central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure estimation may contribute to optimal management in patients undergoing the Fontan operation. We tested the hypothesis that central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure in those undergoing the Fontan operation can be simply estimated using peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure, respectively. METHODS: This study included 30 patients after the Fontan operation who underwent cardiac catheterization (median 8.6, 3.4-42 years). Peripheral venous pressure was measured at the peripheral vein in the upper extremities. Mean circulatory filling pressure was calculated by the changes of arterial pressure and central venous pressure during the Valsalva maneuver. Arm equilibrium pressure was measured as equilibrated venous pressure by rapidly inflating a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg. RESULTS: Central venous pressure and peripheral venous pressure were highly correlated (central venous pressure = 1.6 + 0.68 × peripheral venous pressure, R = 0.86, P < .0001). Stepwise multivariable regression analysis showed that only peripheral venous pressure was a significant determinant of central venous pressure. Central venous pressure was accurately estimated using regression after volume loading by contrast injection (R = 0.82, P < .0001). In addition, arm equilibrium pressure measurements were highly reproducible and robustly reflected invasively measured mean circulatory filling pressure (mean circulatory filling pressure = 9.1 + 0.63 × arm equilibrium pressure, R = 0.88, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure can be noninvasively estimated by peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure, respectively. This should help clarify unidentified Fontan pathophysiology and the mechanisms of Fontan failure progression, thereby helping construct effective tailor-made approaches to prevent Fontan failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masutani et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Fontan circulation (n=30). Peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure measurement vs. Invasive central venous pressure and mean circulatory filling pressure was evaluated on Correlation between central venous pressure and peripheral venous pressure (R = 0.86, p=<.0001). Peripheral venous pressure and arm equilibrium pressure strongly correlated with invasively measured central venous pressure (R=0.86, P<0.0001) and mean circulatory filling pressure (R=0.88, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: