Why the study?
Strain assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking is useful to identify subclinical ventricular dysfunction after doxorubicin use, but its role and determinants need investigation.
Does prior doxorubicin use lead to subclinical ventricular dysfunction detected by speckle tracking in patients with normal LVEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=81)
Does prior doxorubicin use lead to subclinical ventricular dysfunction detected by speckle tracking in patients with normal LVEF?
Speckle tracking echocardiography can detect subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (reduced longitudinal and circumferential strain) in patients approximately 2 years after doxorubicin therapy despite preserved LVEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speckle tracking may detect subclinical doxorubicin cardiotoxicity despite normal LVEF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a severe complication associated with doxorubicin (DOX) use. Strain, assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-STE), has been shown to be useful in identifying subclinical ventricular dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: a) To investigate the role of strain in the identification of subclinical ventricular dysfunction in patients who used DOX; b) to investigate determinants of strain response in these patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 81 participants: 40 patients who used DOX ± 2 years before the study and 41 controls. All participants had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 55%. Total dose of DOX was 396 mg (242 mg/ms2). The systolic function of the LV was evaluated by LVEF (Simpson), as well as by longitudinal (εLL), circumferential (εCC), and radial (εRR) strains. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) analysis was performed using εLL (model 1) and εCC (model 2) as dependent variables. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were higher in the control group (p < 0.05). εLL was lower in the DOX group (-12.4 ± 2.6%) versus controls (-13.4 ± 1.7%; p = 0.044). The same occurred with εCC: -12.1 ± 2.7% (DOX) versus -16.7 ± 3.6% (controls; p < 0.001). The S' wave was shorter in the DOX group (p = 0.035). On MLR, DOX was an independent predictor of reduced εCC (B = -4.429, p < 0.001). DOX (B = -1.289, p = 0.012) and age (B = -0.057, p = 0.029) were independent markers of reduced εLL. CONCLUSION: a) εLL, εCC and the S' wave are reduced in patients who used DOX ± 2 years prior to the study despite normal LVEF, suggesting the presence of subclinical ventricular dysfunction; b) DOX was an independent predictor of reduced εCC; c) prior use of DOX and age were independent markers of reduced εLL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical ventricular dysfunction (n=81). Doxorubicin vs. Controls was evaluated on Longitudinal strain (εLL) (p=0.044).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: