Key result
Psychoeducational intervention fails to improve immunosuppressive medication adherence over standard care due to near-maximal rates.
Why the study?
Nonadherence to medical recommendations in heart transplant recipients is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, and the effect of psychoeducational interventions on adherence is unclear.
Does a manualized psychoeducational intervention improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication in patients awaiting heart transplantation?
RCT (n=200)
Does a manualized psychoeducational intervention improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication in patients awaiting heart transplantation?
p-value: p=>0.99
A manualized psychoeducational intervention did not significantly improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication, cardiac rejection, or mortality in heart transplant recipients, as adherence was already high with standard care.
No added benefit from manualized psychoeducation when adherence is already near-maximal; confirms standard care suffices in this RCT population.
Introduction In heart transplant recipients, nonadherence is associated with higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Research Question Can a psychoeducational intervention enhance adherence to medical recommendations? Design We randomized 200 patients awaiting heart transplantation on the high urgency wait list to a manualized psychoeducational intervention or standard care. Follow-up continued to three years after transplantation. Primary endpoint was adherence to immunosuppressive medication, assessed at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. Secondary endpoints were barriers to adherence during follow-up and clinical outcomes, including cardiac rejection within the first postoperative year and postoperative 3-year mortality. Results Fifty patients died before or within the first 3 months of transplantation. The primary endpoint was analyzed in 66 patients in the intervention group and 66 in the control group. Both study groups showed almost maximal adherence to immunosuppressive medication throughout follow-up, with no significant time x treatment interaction (P>0.99). Likewise, there was no significant time x treatment interaction ( P=0.41) on barriers to adherence. The percentage of patients with International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation standard grade 1 and 2 rejection was in the intervention and control groups 82.5% and 78.7%, respectively, and 8.8% and 13.1%, respectively, without significant differences between study groups ( P=0.75). Considering all randomized and transplanted patients in the intervention group (N=85) and control group (N=87), postoperative 3-year mortality was 29.4% and 27.6%, respectively ( P=0.82). Conclusions Adherence to immunosuppressive medication was high, even without a complex, manualized psychoeducational intervention. The intervention had no significant positive impact on cardiac rejection and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tigges‐Limmer et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Heart transplantation (n=200). Manualized psychoeducational intervention vs. Standard care was evaluated on Adherence to immunosuppressive medication (p=>0.99). A manualized psychoeducational intervention did not significantly improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication compared to standard care, as both groups showed almost maximal adherence (P>0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: