Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 21, 2026Journal of the American College of CardiologyOpen Access

The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Doppler flow velocity ≥4.5 m/s in asymptomatic AS linked to ~390% higher cardiac event risk.

  • RR 4.9
  • P=0.004
  • n=143

Authors

Patricia A. Pellikka
Patricia A. PellikkaCardiac Imaging
Rick A. Nishimura
Rick A. NishimuraStructural Heart Disease
Kent R. Bailey
Kent R. BaileyCross-Cutting Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Cohort study reveals high symptom-free survival in asymptomatic aortic stenosis, indicating conservative management is safe until symptoms develop.

Key Points

  • To document the natural history, clinical outcomes, and predictors of cardiac events in adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant valvular aortic stenosis.
  • Followed 143 asymptomatic adults with isolated valvular aortic stenosis defined by Doppler echocardiography peak systolic flow velocity ≥ 4 m/s.
  • Compared outcomes between patients undergoing valve intervention within 3 months (Group 1, N=30) and those managed without early intervention (Group 2, N=113) over a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 6 to 48).
  • In unoperated patients (Group 2), actuarial freedom from symptoms (angina, dyspnea, syncope) was 86% at 1 year and 62% at 2 years, while freedom from cardiac events was 93% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years.
  • All 3 cardiac deaths in Group 2 were preceded by symptoms for at least 3 months, whereas Group 1 experienced 3 post-operative cardiac events (2 deaths, 1 reoperation).
  • Doppler flow velocity (p = 0.004) and ejection fraction (p = 0.01) independently predicted cardiac events; peak velocity ≥ 4.5 m/s carried a relative risk of 4.9 (p = 0.004).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=143)

PICO

P
Population
143 adults with asymptomatic, isolated valvular aortic stenosis (peak systolic flow velocity ≥ 4 m/s) followed for a mean of 20 months.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Doppler flow velocity ≥ 4.5 m/s vs Doppler flow velocity < 4.5 m/s
O
Primary Outcome
Cardiac event — RR 4.9, p=0.004

Main Result

Relative Risk: 4.9

p-value: p=0.004

Cite This Study

Pellikka et al. (1990) conducted a cohort in asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis (n=143). Doppler flow velocity ≥ 4.5 m/s vs. Doppler flow velocity < 4.5 m/s was evaluated on Cardiac event (RR 4.9, p=0.004). In adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis, a Doppler flow velocity ≥4.5 m/s was associated with an increased risk of sustaining a cardiac event (RR 4.9, p=0.004).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab0a176c4506eff882efdd8https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90234-g
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography.1986 · 375 citations
  2. 2Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects: Evaluation of an adult population without clinically apparent heart disease1979 · 336 citations