Key result
Targeting a mean arterial pressure of 80-85 mmHg compared to 65-70 mmHg showed no difference in mortality, though it decreased the need for renal replacement therapy in patients with hypertension.
Why the study?
The optimal heart rate and blood pressure targets for resuscitation in patients with circulatory shock remain uncertain and challenging for intensivists.
What are the ideal blood pressure and heart rate targets for resuscitating patients in circulatory shock?
What are the ideal blood pressure and heart rate targets for resuscitating patients in circulatory shock?
The ideal target blood pressure in circulatory shock resuscitation is variable and likely depends on prior blood pressure, while heart rate regulation with beta-blockade appears safe in selected patients.
Optimal MAP/HR targets in shock remain undefined; leaves open the need for definitive RCTs to refine resuscitation strategies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Circulatory shock is a complicated problem that carries a high risk of complications and mortality for critically ill patients. The heart rate and blood pressure targets to which a patient in shock should be resuscitated remain a challenge to intensivists. RECENT FINDINGS: While the ideal blood pressure and heart rate in circulatory shock are still not definitive, recent studies have begun to refine these targets. A recent trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 80-85 mmHg with a target of 65-70 mmHg showed no difference in mortality, with a decreased need for renal replacement therapy in patients with pre-existing hypertension based on subgroup analysis. Regulation of heart rate was defined by a trial demonstrating that heart rate control in patients with severe sepsis on high-dose norepinephrine with esmolol titration did not result in additional adverse events. SUMMARY: The ideal target blood pressure in the resuscitation of circulatory shock is variable and likely depends on prior blood pressure. Heart rate regulation with β-blockade appears to be safe in selected patients when accompanied by adequate resuscitation and monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DellaVolpe et al. (2015) conducted a review in Circulatory shock. Mean arterial pressure targets and heart rate regulation was evaluated. Targeting a mean arterial pressure of 80-85 mmHg compared to 65-70 mmHg showed no difference in mortality, though it decreased the need for renal replacement therapy in patients with hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: