Key result
SGLT2i linked to ~29% lower risk of hHF or all-cause death vs DPP4i.
Why the study?
The benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular disease events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without CVD history was unclear.
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular disease events compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=625,739)
Yes
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular disease events compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Hazard Ratio: 0.712 (95% CI 0.613–0.826)
In a real-world Japanese cohort, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes.
SGLT2i may lower heart failure hospitalization and death versus DPP4i in type 2 diabetes without prior CVD; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without a CVD history. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Japanese hospital administrative data from the Medical Data Vision database (January 2015 to April 2020). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 625,739) who were new users of an SGLT2i (n = 57,070; 9.1%) or DPP4i (n = 568,669; 90.9%) were included. Outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (hHF), all-cause death (ACD) and the composite of hHF or ACD. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the inverse probability weighting Cox proportional hazards model to compare CVD event risks between treatment groups. RESULTS: Compared with DPP4i, SGLT2i was associated with a significant reduction in hHF risk among patients without a CVD history (HR 0.507, 95% confidence interval 0.283-0.907), but not in the full cohort or those with a CVD history. SGLT2i was associated with a significant risk reduction of ACD (HR 0.592, 95% confidence interval 0.481-0.729) and the composite of hHF or ACD (HR 0.712, 95% confidence interval 0.613-0.826), compared with DPP4i in the full cohort; similar results were observed among patients with and without a CVD history. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, SGLT2i versus DPP4i was associated with a significant reduction in hHF, ACD and hHF or ACD events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without a CVD history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kashiwagi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=625,739). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) was evaluated on Composite of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF) or all-cause death (ACD) (HR 0.712, 95% CI 0.613-0.826). In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of the composite of hospitalization for heart failure or all-cause death compared with DPP4i (HR 0.712; 95% CI 0.613-0.826).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: