Key result
Long-term heart transplant recipients maintain near-maximal MAP-CBV coherence comparable to controls during squat-stand maneuvers.
Why the study?
It is not fully elucidated if mean arterial pressure leads to augmented cerebral pressure-flow coherence independently, or if heart rate and/or Pco2 also contribute during squat-stand maneuvers.
Does heart rate independently influence the cerebral pressure-flow relationship during squat-stand maneuvers in heart transplant recipients compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=40)
Does heart rate independently influence the cerebral pressure-flow relationship during squat-stand maneuvers in heart transplant recipients compared to controls?
Augmented coherence in the cerebral pressure-flow relationship during squat-stand maneuvers is driven by blood pressure rather than heart rate, as demonstrated in heart transplant recipients.
MAP drives SSM-augmented coherence independently of HR; leaves open HR/Pco2 contributions in broader populations.
Previous research has highlighted that squat-stand maneuvers (SSMs) augment coherence values within the cerebral pressure-flow relationship to ∼0.99. However, it is not fully elucidated if mean arterial pressure (MAP) leads to this physiological entrainment independently, or if heart rate (HR) and/or the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2) also have contributing influences. A 2:1 control-to-case model was used in the present investigation [participant number ( n) = 40; n = 16 age-matched (AM); n = 16 donor control (DM); n = 8 heart transplant recipients (HTRs)]. The latter group was used to mechanistically isolate the extent to which HR influences the cerebral pressure-flow relationship. Participants completed 5 min of squat-stand maneuvers at 0.05 Hz (10 s) and 0.10 Hz (5 s). Linear transfer function analysis (TFA) examined the relationship between different physiological inputs (i.e., MAP, HR, and Pco2) and output [cerebral blood velocity (CBV)] during SSM; and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS). Compared with DM, cardiac BRS was reduced in AM ( P < 0.001), which was further reduced in HTR ( P < 0.045). In addition, during the SSM, HR was elevated in HTR compared with both control groups ( P < 0.001), but all groups had near-maximal coherence metrics ≥0.98 at 0.05 Hz and ≥0.99 at 0.10 Hz ( P ≥ 0.399). In contrast, the mean HR-CBV/Pco2-CBV relationships ranged from 0.38 (HTR) to 0.81 (DM). Despite near abolishment of BRS and blunted HR following heart transplantation, long-term HTR exhibited near-maximal coherence within the MAP-CBV relationship, comparable with AM and DM. Therefore, these results show that the augmented coherence with SSM is driven by blood pressure, whereas elevations in TFA coherence as a result of HR contribution are likely correlational in nature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burma et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Heart transplant recipients (n=40). Heart transplantation vs. Age-matched and donor controls was evaluated on Transfer function coherence within the mean arterial pressure-cerebral blood velocity relationship during squat-stand maneuvers (p=≥0.399). Long-term heart transplant recipients exhibited near-maximal MAP-CBV coherence during squat-stand maneuvers (≥0.98 at 0.05 Hz and ≥0.99 at 0.10 Hz; P≥0.399), comparable to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: