Key result
Extended DAPT fails to reduce MACCEs compared with guideline-based therapy after DES implantation.
Why the study?
There are limited data about the long-term efficacy of extended dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation in real-world practice.
Does extended dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months) reduce major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation compared to guideline-based DAPT (≤12 months)?
Cohort (n=1,470)
No
Does extended dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months) reduce major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation compared to guideline-based DAPT (≤12 months)?
Hazard Ratio: 0.828 (95% CI 0.657–1.044)
Absolute Event Rate: 18.3% vs 21%
p-value: p=0.111
Extended DAPT beyond 12 months after DES implantation does not significantly reduce overall MACCE but is associated with lower rates of non-fatal MI, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis without a significant increase in bleeding complications.
BACKGROUND: Extended dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is frequently used for high-risk patients in real-world practice. However, there are limited data about the long-term efficacy of extended DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study investigated 1,470 patients who underwent PCI. The study population was divided into 2 groups based on DAPT duration: guideline-based DAPT (G-DAPT; DAPT ≤12 months after PCI; n=747) and extended DAPT (E-DAPT; DAPT >12 months after PCI; n=723). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat target vessel revascularization, or stroke. The median follow-up duration was 80.8 months (interquartile range 60.6-97.1 months). The incidence of MACCE was similar in the G-DAPT and E-DAPT groups (21.0% vs. 18.3%, respectively; P=0.111). However, the E-DAPT group had a lower incidence of non-fatal MI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.535; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.329-0.869; P=0.011), and target lesion revascularization (HR 0.490; 95% CI 0.304-0.792; P=0.004), and stent thrombosis (HR 0.291; 95% CI 0.123-0.688; P=0.005). The incidence of bleeding complications, including major bleeding, was similar between the 2 groups (5.2% vs. 6.3%, respectively; P=0.471). CONCLUSIONS: Although E-DAPT after DES implantation was not associated with a reduced rate of MACCE, it was associated with a significantly lower incidence of non-fatal MI, TLR, and stent thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=1,470). Extended dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months) vs. Guideline-based dual antiplatelet therapy (≤12 months) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (HR 0.828, 95% CI 0.657-1.044, p=0.111). Extended dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared to guideline-based therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: