Key result
CMR mapping improves heart failure diagnosis and prognosis by detailing underlying tissue pathophysiology.
Why the study?
Despite advances in heart failure diagnostics and therapy, prognosis remains poor partly due to difficulties in risk stratification and therapy personalization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping techniques offer valuable pathophysiological insights and prognostic data to improve risk stratification in heart failure beyond simple left ventricular ejection fraction assessment.
Despite significant advances in heart failure diagnostics and therapy, the prognosis remains poor, with one in three dying within a year of hospital admission. This is at least in part due to the difficulties in risk stratification and personalisation of therapy. The use of left ventricular systolic function as the main arbiter for entrance into clinical trials for drugs and advanced therapy, such as implantable defibrillators, grossly simplifies the complex heterogeneous nature of the syndrome. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance offers a wealth of data to aid in diagnosis and prognostication. The advent of novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping techniques allows us to glimpse some of the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning heart failure. We review the growing prognostic evidence base using these techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2017) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping techniques was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping techniques provide valuable prognostic and diagnostic data by revealing the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: