Key result
Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty acutely lowers mean gradient, but restenosis recurs by ~6 months.
Why the study?
The short-term results and clinical outcomes of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in elderly high-risk patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis were evaluated.
Does percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty improve echocardiographic and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Population
55 consecutive elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk
Comparison
Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty with no comparator
Design
Observational case series
Follow-up
Mean 6.2 months
Authors
Loading...
High short-term mortality and reinterventions after balloon valvuloplasty in high-risk elderly patients; leaves open its comparative role versus surgery in prospective trials.
Observational (n=55)
Does percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty improve echocardiographic and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis provides initial hemodynamic improvement that is frequently lost at short-term follow-up due to restenosis, though a subset experiences sustained clinical benefit.
Nishimura et al. (1988) conducted an observational in calcific aortic stenosis (n=55). Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty was evaluated on Aortic valve mean gradient (p=<0.0001). Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty initially reduced aortic valve mean gradient (48 to 33 mm Hg, p<0.0001), but restenosis occurred at 6.2 months with gradient returning to 46 mm Hg (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: