Key result
Diastolic dysfunction shows no significant difference in pulmonary vascular resistance compared to systolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
Patients with diastolic dysfunction, particularly elderly, may have disproportionate pulmonary hypertension due to a pre-capillary component beyond venous congestion, but this relationship is unclear.
Is pulmonary vascular resistance disproportionately higher in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction compared to those with systolic dysfunction?
Observational (n=389)
No
Is pulmonary vascular resistance disproportionately higher in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction compared to those with systolic dysfunction?
Mean Difference: 0.4 (95% CI -3.03–3.83)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.13% vs 3.52%
p-value: p=0.99
In elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension is primarily driven by filling pressures rather than disproportionate pre-capillary arterial remodeling, suggesting therapies should target venous congestion.
No excess PVR in elderly diastolic versus systolic dysfunction; hypothesis-generating for PH mechanisms and leaves subtype-specific therapies unproven.
PURPOSE: Patients with diastolic dysfunction may have a disproportionate degree of elevation in pulmonary pressure, particularly in the elderly. Higher pulmonary vascular resistance in the elderly patients with heart failure but preserved ejection fraction suggests that beyond the post-capillary contribution of pulmonary venous congestion, a pre-capillary component of pulmonary arterial hypertension occurs. We aim to identify if pulmonary vascular resistance in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction is disproportionately higher than patients with systolic dysfunction independent of filling pressures. METHODS: 389 patients identified retrospectively between 2003- 2010; elderly with preserved ejection fraction, elderly with depressed ejection fraction, and primary arterial hypertension who underwent right-heart catheterization at Rush University. RESULTS: No significant difference in pulmonary vascular resistance between systolic and diastolic dysfunction. The mean difference in pulmonary vascular resistance was not statistically significant at 0.40 mmHg·min/l (95% CI -3.03 to 3.83) with similar left ventricular filling pressures with mean difference of 3.38 mmHg (95% CI, -1.27 to 8.02). When adjusted for filling pressures, there remained no difference in pulmonary vascular resistance for systolic and diastolic dysfunction. The mean pulmonary vascular resistance is more elevated in systolic heart failure compared to diastolic heart failure with means 3.13 mmHg·min/l and 3.52 mmHg·min/l, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no other association identified for secondary pulmonary hypertension other than diastolic dysfunction and chronic venous pulmonary hypertension. Our results argue against any significant arterial remodeling that would lead to disproportionate pre-capillary hypertension, and implies that treatment should focus on lowering filling pressure rather than treating the pulmonary vascular tree.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afshar et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pulmonary Hypertension (n=389). Diastolic dysfunction vs. Systolic dysfunction was evaluated on Pulmonary vascular resistance (MD 0.40, 95% CI -3.03 to 3.83, p=0.99). Diastolic dysfunction in elderly patients was not associated with a disproportionately higher pulmonary vascular resistance compared to systolic dysfunction (mean difference 0.40 Wood units, p=0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: