Key result
Endocardial voltage-map scars are linked to higher definitive ARVC diagnosis rates,.
Why the study?
The relations between endocardial voltage mapping and the genetic background of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy have not been investigated.
Does endocardial voltage mapping correlate with diagnosis and genetics in patients with proved or suspected ARVC?
Observational (n=97)
Does endocardial voltage mapping correlate with diagnosis and genetics in patients with proved or suspected ARVC?
Endocardial voltage mapping correlates with definitive ARVC diagnosis and genetic mutations, suggesting its utility in refining diagnosis and detecting minor forms of the disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ARVC diagnosis via voltage mapping; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
The relations between endocardial voltage mapping and the genetic background of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) have not been investigated so far. A total of 97 patients with proved or suspected ARVC who underwent 3-dimensional endocardial mapping and genetic testing have been retrospectively included. Presence, localization, and size of scar areas were correlated to ARVC diagnosis and the presence of a pathogenic variant. A total of 78 patients (80%) presented with some bipolar or unipolar scar on endocardial voltage mapping, whereas 43 carried pathogenic variants (44%). Significant associations were observed between presence of endocardial scars on voltage mapping and previous or inducible ventricular tachycardia, right ventricular function and dimensions, or electrocardiogram features of ARVC. A total of 60 of the 78 patients (77%) with an endocardial scar fulfilled the criteria for a definitive arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia diagnosis versus 8 of 19 patients (42%) without scar (p = 0.003). Patients with a definitive diagnosis of ARVC had more scars from any location and the scars were larger in patients with ARVC. In the 68 patients with a definitive diagnosis of ARVC, the presence of any endocardial scar was similar whether an ARVC-causal mutation was present or not. Only scar extent was significantly greater in patients with pathogenic variants. There was no difference in the presence and characteristics of scars in PKP2 mutated versus other mutated patients. The 3-dimensional endocardial mapping could have an important role for refining ARVC diagnosis and may be able to detect minor forms with otherwise insufficient criteria for diagnosis. The trend for larger scar extent were observed in mutated patients, without any difference according to the mutated genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delasnerie et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (n=97). Endocardial scar on voltage mapping vs. No endocardial scar was evaluated on Definitive arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia diagnosis (p=0.003). Endocardial scars on voltage mapping were associated with a definitive ARVC diagnosis, present in 77% of patients with a scar versus 42% without.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: